Find Comparable Stocks for Enbridge Inc.
Enbridge Inc.
ENB - NYQEnbridge Inc. is an energy infrastructure company. The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
TC Energy Corporation
TRP - NYQTC Energy Corporation is an energy infrastructure company in North America. The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.
TransCanada Corporation operates in a similar energy infrastructure sector, focusing on pipelines and energy transportation, making it a direct competitor to Enbridge.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 69%
R-squared: 47%
This indicates a moderate positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 7
- ENB in TRP's comparables: Yes
- TRP in ENB's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 44% vs 4%
- Profit Margin: 10% vs 34%
- ROE: 8% vs 13%
- Operating Margin: 17% vs 41%
- Revenue (TTM): $53.5B vs $13.8B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $92.9B vs $48.2B
Size Category: Large Cap vs Large Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 26.31 vs 16.49
- P/B Ratio: 2.27 vs 2.69
- EV/EBITDA: 14.32 vs 11.53
- Forward P/E: 20.53 vs 16.75
- PEG Ratio: 2.11 vs 1.54
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: ENERGY & TRANSPORTATION vs ENERGY & TRANSPORTATION
- Industry: PIPE LINES (NO NATURAL GAS) vs NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- ENB Rating: Buy
- TRP Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- ENB Country: USA
- TRP Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NYQ vs NYQ
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- ENB Beta: 0.89 (Average)
- TRP Beta: 0.82 (Low)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- ENB Price vs 200-day MA: 106.02%
- TRP Price vs 200-day MA: 104.09%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- ENB Dividend Yield: 6%
- TRP Dividend Yield: 5%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
ONEOK, Inc.
OKE - NYQOneok, Inc. is a diversified Fortune 500 energy corporation based in Tulsa, Oklahoma.
OneMain Holdings, Inc. provides energy infrastructure services in a related field, making it comparable in terms of operational focus within the energy sector.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 50%
R-squared: 25%
This indicates a weak positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 5
- ENB in OKE's comparables: No
- OKE in ENB's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 44% vs 34%
- Profit Margin: 10% vs 14%
- ROE: 8% vs 16%
- Operating Margin: 17% vs 23%
- Revenue (TTM): $53.5B vs $21.7B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $92.9B vs $57.4B
Size Category: Large Cap vs Large Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 26.31 vs 17.77
- P/B Ratio: 2.27 vs 3.44
- EV/EBITDA: 14.32 vs 13.59
- Forward P/E: 20.53 vs 16.10
- PEG Ratio: 2.11 vs 1.60
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: ENERGY & TRANSPORTATION vs ENERGY & TRANSPORTATION
- Industry: PIPE LINES (NO NATURAL GAS) vs NATURAL GAS TRANSMISISON & DISTRIBUTION
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- ENB Rating: Buy
- OKE Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- ENB Country: USA
- OKE Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NYQ vs NYQ
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- ENB Beta: 0.89 (Average)
- OKE Beta: 1.67 (High)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- ENB Price vs 200-day MA: 106.02%
- OKE Price vs 200-day MA: 98.06%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- ENB Dividend Yield: 6%
- OKE Dividend Yield: 4%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
The Williams Companies, Inc.
WMB - NYQThe Williams Companies, Inc., is an American energy company based in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Its core business is natural gas processing and transportation, with additional petroleum and electricity generation assets.
Williams Companies, Inc. is engaged in the natural gas and natural gas liquids sector, providing a similar investment profile to Enbridge in the energy transportation space.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 43%
R-squared: 19%
This indicates a weak positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 3
- ENB in WMB's comparables: Yes
- WMB in ENB's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 44% vs 16%
- Profit Margin: 10% vs 21%
- ROE: 8% vs 16%
- Operating Margin: 17% vs 29%
- Revenue (TTM): $53.5B vs $10.8B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $92.9B vs $68.6B
Size Category: Large Cap vs Large Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 26.31 vs 30.89
- P/B Ratio: 2.27 vs 5.58
- EV/EBITDA: 14.32 vs 14.64
- Forward P/E: 20.53 vs 26.45
- PEG Ratio: 2.11 vs 9.44
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: ENERGY & TRANSPORTATION vs ENERGY & TRANSPORTATION
- Industry: PIPE LINES (NO NATURAL GAS) vs NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- ENB Rating: Buy
- WMB Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- ENB Country: USA
- WMB Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NYQ vs NYQ
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- ENB Beta: 0.89 (Average)
- WMB Beta: 1.07 (Average)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- ENB Price vs 200-day MA: 106.02%
- WMB Price vs 200-day MA: 113.62%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- ENB Dividend Yield: 6%
- WMB Dividend Yield: 4%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
PPL Corporation
PPL - NYQPPL Corporation is an energy company headquartered in Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States.
Pembina Pipeline Corporation is involved in the transportation and storage of hydrocarbons, similar to Enbridge's focus on energy infrastructure.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 37%
R-squared: 14%
This indicates a weak positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 1
- ENB in PPL's comparables: No
- PPL in ENB's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 44% vs 9%
- Profit Margin: 10% vs 11%
- ROE: 8% vs 6%
- Operating Margin: 17% vs 15%
- Revenue (TTM): $53.5B vs $8.5B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $92.9B vs $25.5B
Size Category: Large Cap vs Large Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 26.31 vs 28.78
- P/B Ratio: 2.27 vs 1.82
- EV/EBITDA: 14.32 vs 13.12
- Forward P/E: 20.53 vs 19.19
- PEG Ratio: 2.11 vs 1.32
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: ENERGY & TRANSPORTATION vs ENERGY & TRANSPORTATION
- Industry: PIPE LINES (NO NATURAL GAS) vs ELECTRIC SERVICES
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- ENB Rating: Buy
- PPL Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- ENB Country: USA
- PPL Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NYQ vs NYQ
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- ENB Beta: 0.89 (Average)
- PPL Beta: 0.78 (Low)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- ENB Price vs 200-day MA: 106.02%
- PPL Price vs 200-day MA: 109.10%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- ENB Dividend Yield: 6%
- PPL Dividend Yield: 3%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Select Mutual Comparables:
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
KMI - NYQKinder Morgan, Inc. is one of the largest energy infrastructure companies in North America. The company specializes in owning and controlling oil and gas pipelines and terminals.
Kinder Morgan Inc. specializes in the transportation and storage of natural gas, liquids, and other energy products, aligning closely with Enbridge's pipeline operations.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 40%
R-squared: 16%
This indicates a weak positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 6
- ENB in KMI's comparables: Yes
- KMI in ENB's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 44% vs -1%
- Profit Margin: 10% vs 17%
- ROE: 8% vs 9%
- Operating Margin: 17% vs 29%
- Revenue (TTM): $53.5B vs $15.1B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $92.9B vs $59.4B
Size Category: Large Cap vs Large Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 26.31 vs 22.85
- P/B Ratio: 2.27 vs 1.96
- EV/EBITDA: 14.32 vs 13.59
- Forward P/E: 20.53 vs 21.14
- PEG Ratio: 2.11 vs 2.41
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: ENERGY & TRANSPORTATION vs ENERGY & TRANSPORTATION
- Industry: PIPE LINES (NO NATURAL GAS) vs NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- ENB Rating: Buy
- KMI Rating: Hold
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- ENB Country: USA
- KMI Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NYQ vs NYQ
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- ENB Beta: 0.89 (Average)
- KMI Beta: 0.94 (Average)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- ENB Price vs 200-day MA: 106.02%
- KMI Price vs 200-day MA: 112.22%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- ENB Dividend Yield: 6%
- KMI Dividend Yield: 4%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Boyd Gaming Corporation
BYD - NYQBoyd Gaming Corporation is a multi-jurisdictional gaming company. The company is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 21%
R-squared: 5%
This indicates a negligible relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 0
- BYD in ENB's comparables: No
- ENB in BYD's comparables: No
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 9% vs 44%
- Profit Margin: 15% vs 10%
- ROE: 35% vs 8%
- Operating Margin: 25% vs 17%
- Revenue (TTM): $3.9B vs $53.5B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $6.1B vs $92.9B
Size Category: Mid Cap vs Large Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 11.77 vs 26.31
- P/B Ratio: 3.94 vs 2.27
- EV/EBITDA: 8.16 vs 14.32
- Forward P/E: 10.47 vs 20.53
- PEG Ratio: 0.85 vs 2.11
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: REAL ESTATE & CONSTRUCTION vs ENERGY & TRANSPORTATION
- Industry: HOTELS & MOTELS vs PIPE LINES (NO NATURAL GAS)
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- BYD Rating: Buy
- ENB Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- BYD Country: USA
- ENB Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NYQ vs NYQ
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- BYD Beta: 1.56 (High)
- ENB Beta: 0.89 (Average)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- BYD Price vs 200-day MA: 111.82%
- ENB Price vs 200-day MA: 106.02%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- BYD Dividend Yield: 1%
- ENB Dividend Yield: 6%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Loading comparable stocks ...
TC Energy Corporation
TRP - NYQTC Energy Corporation is an energy infrastructure company in North America. The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.
TC Energy Corporation is an energy infrastructure company in North America. The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.
ONEOK, Inc.
OKE - NYQOneok, Inc. is a diversified Fortune 500 energy corporation based in Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Oneok, Inc. is a diversified Fortune 500 energy corporation based in Tulsa, Oklahoma.
The Williams Companies, Inc.
WMB - NYQThe Williams Companies, Inc., is an American energy company based in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Its core business is natural gas processing and transportation, with additional petroleum and electricity generati...
The Williams Companies, Inc., is an American energy company based in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Its core business is natural gas processing and transportation, with additional petroleum and electricity generation assets.
PPL Corporation
PPL - NYQPPL Corporation is an energy company headquartered in Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States.
PPL Corporation is an energy company headquartered in Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States.
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
KMI - NYQKinder Morgan, Inc. is one of the largest energy infrastructure companies in North America. The company specializes in owning and controlling oil and gas pipelines and terminals.
Kinder Morgan, Inc. is one of the largest energy infrastructure companies in North America. The company specializes in owning and controlling oil and gas pipelines and terminals.
Boyd Gaming Corporation
BYD - NYQBoyd Gaming Corporation is a multi-jurisdictional gaming company. The company is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada.
Boyd Gaming Corporation is a multi-jurisdictional gaming company. The company is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada.