Find Comparable Stocks for Meta Platforms, Inc.
Meta Platforms, Inc.
META - NMSMeta Platforms, Inc. develops products that enable people to connect and share with friends and family through mobile devices, PCs, virtual reality headsets, wearables and home devices around the world. The company is headquartered in Menlo Park, California.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Microsoft Corporation
MSFT - NMSMicrosoft Corporation is an American multinational technology company which produces computer software, consumer electronics, personal computers, and related services. Its best known software products are the Microsoft Windows line of operating systems, the Microsoft Office suite, and the Internet Explorer and Edge web browsers. Its flagship hardware products are the Xbox video game consoles and the Microsoft Surface lineup of touchscreen personal computers. Microsoft ranked No. 21 in the 2020 Fortune 500 rankings of the largest United States corporations by total revenue; it was the world's largest software maker by revenue as of 2016. It is considered one of the Big Five companies in the U.S. information technology industry, along with Google, Apple, Amazon, and Facebook.
Microsoft Corporation provides software and services that enhance user connectivity and collaboration, similar to Meta's offerings. Both companies are heavily invested in cloud services and AI, driving future growth in the technology sector.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 46%
R-squared: 21%
This indicates a weak positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 7
- META in MSFT's comparables: No
- MSFT in META's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 21% vs 12%
- Profit Margin: 38% vs 35%
- ROE: 37% vs 34%
- Operating Margin: 45% vs 46%
- Revenue (TTM): $164.5B vs $261.8B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $1,693.0B vs $2,951.1B
Size Category: Mega Cap vs Mega Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 28.02 vs 31.94
- P/B Ratio: 9.27 vs 9.75
- EV/EBITDA: 19.16 vs 20.59
- Forward P/E: 26.32 vs 30.21
- PEG Ratio: 1.34 vs 2.07
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: TECHNOLOGY vs TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: SERVICES-COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, DATA PROCESSING, ETC. vs SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- META Rating: Buy
- MSFT Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- META Country: USA
- MSFT Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NMS vs NMS
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- META Beta: 1.20 (Average)
- MSFT Beta: 0.90 (Average)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
business similarity
Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.
This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.
A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- META Price vs 200-day MA: 118.76%
- MSFT Price vs 200-day MA: 93.19%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- META Dividend Yield: 0%
- MSFT Dividend Yield: 1%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Alphabet Inc.
GOOGL - NMSAlphabet Inc. is an American multinational conglomerate headquartered in Mountain View, California. It was created through a restructuring of Google on October 2, 2015, and became the parent company of Google and several former Google subsidiaries. The two co-founders of Google remained as controlling shareholders, board members, and employees at Alphabet. Alphabet is the world's fourth-largest technology company by revenue and one of the world's most valuable companies.
Alphabet Inc. is a direct competitor in the digital advertising space and provides various online services that promote social interaction, aligning closely with Meta's business model. Both companies are leaders in technology and face similar regulatory challenges.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 45%
R-squared: 20%
This indicates a weak positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 8
- GOOGL in META's comparables: Yes
- META in GOOGL's comparables: No
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 12% vs 21%
- Profit Margin: 29% vs 38%
- ROE: 33% vs 37%
- Operating Margin: 34% vs 45%
- Revenue (TTM): $350.0B vs $164.5B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $2,086.0B vs $1,693.0B
Size Category: Mega Cap vs Mega Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 21.18 vs 28.02
- P/B Ratio: 6.39 vs 9.27
- EV/EBITDA: 14.89 vs 19.16
- Forward P/E: 19.23 vs 26.32
- PEG Ratio: 1.23 vs 1.34
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: TECHNOLOGY vs TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: SERVICES-COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, DATA PROCESSING, ETC. vs SERVICES-COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, DATA PROCESSING, ETC.
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- GOOGL Rating: Buy
- META Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- GOOGL Country: USA
- META Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NMS vs NMS
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- GOOGL Beta: 0.99 (Average)
- META Beta: 1.20 (Average)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
business similarity
Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.
This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.
A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- GOOGL Price vs 200-day MA: 96.85%
- META Price vs 200-day MA: 118.76%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- GOOGL Dividend Yield: 0%
- META Dividend Yield: 0%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Amazon.com, Inc.
AMZN - NMSAmazon.com, Inc. is an American multinational technology company which focuses on e-commerce, cloud computing, digital streaming, and artificial intelligence. It is one of the Big Five companies in the U.S. information technology industry, along with Google, Apple, Microsoft, and Facebook. The company has been referred to as one of the most influential economic and cultural forces in the world, as well as the world's most valuable brand.
Amazon.com, Inc. operates in the technology sector and has a vast ecosystem that includes social features through Amazon Prime and Twitch, paralleling Meta's mission of connectivity. Both companies demonstrate substantial growth and innovation in their respective fields.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 59%
R-squared: 34%
This indicates a moderate positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 7
- AMZN in META's comparables: Yes
- META in AMZN's comparables: No
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 11% vs 21%
- Profit Margin: 9% vs 38%
- ROE: 24% vs 37%
- Operating Margin: 11% vs 45%
- Revenue (TTM): $638.0B vs $164.5B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $2,246.3B vs $1,693.0B
Size Category: Mega Cap vs Mega Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 38.26 vs 28.02
- P/B Ratio: 7.87 vs 9.27
- EV/EBITDA: 18.41 vs 19.16
- Forward P/E: 32.36 vs 26.32
- PEG Ratio: 1.79 vs 1.34
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: TRADE & SERVICES vs TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: RETAIL-CATALOG & MAIL-ORDER HOUSES vs SERVICES-COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, DATA PROCESSING, ETC.
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- AMZN Rating: Buy
- META Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- AMZN Country: USA
- META Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NMS vs NMS
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- AMZN Beta: 1.16 (Average)
- META Beta: 1.20 (Average)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
business similarity
Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.
This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.
A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- AMZN Price vs 200-day MA: 106.74%
- META Price vs 200-day MA: 118.76%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Alphabet Inc.
GOOG - NMSAlphabet Inc. is an American multinational conglomerate headquartered in Mountain View, California. It was created through a restructuring of Google on October 2, 2015, and became the parent company of Google and several former Google subsidiaries. The two co-founders of Google remained as controlling shareholders, board members, and employees at Alphabet. Alphabet is the world's fourth-largest technology company by revenue and one of the world's most valuable companies.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 45%
R-squared: 20%
This indicates a weak positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 7
- GOOG in META's comparables: No
- META in GOOG's comparables: No
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 12% vs 21%
- Profit Margin: 29% vs 38%
- ROE: 33% vs 37%
- Operating Margin: 34% vs 45%
- Revenue (TTM): $350.0B vs $164.5B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $2,085.2B vs $1,693.0B
Size Category: Mega Cap vs Mega Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 21.41 vs 28.02
- P/B Ratio: 6.46 vs 9.27
- EV/EBITDA: 14.89 vs 19.16
- Forward P/E: 19.42 vs 26.32
- PEG Ratio: 1.25 vs 1.34
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: TECHNOLOGY vs TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: SERVICES-COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, DATA PROCESSING, ETC. vs SERVICES-COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, DATA PROCESSING, ETC.
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- GOOG Rating: Buy
- META Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- GOOG Country: USA
- META Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NMS vs NMS
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- GOOG Beta: 0.99 (Average)
- META Beta: 1.20 (Average)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
business similarity
Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.
This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.
A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- GOOG Price vs 200-day MA: 97.07%
- META Price vs 200-day MA: 118.76%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- GOOG Dividend Yield: 0%
- META Dividend Yield: 0%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Apple Inc.
AAPL - NMSApple Inc. is an American multinational technology company that specializes in consumer electronics, computer software, and online services. Apple is the world's largest technology company by revenue (totalling $274.5 billion in 2020) and, since January 2021, the world's most valuable company. As of 2021, Apple is the world's fourth-largest PC vendor by unit sales, and fourth-largest smartphone manufacturer. It is one of the Big Five American information technology companies, along with Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and Facebook.
Apple Inc. operates in the technology sector and offers a range of products and services that connect people, similar to Meta's focus on connectivity and social interaction. Both companies also invest heavily in innovative technologies and have significant market capitalizations.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 32%
R-squared: 10%
This indicates a weak positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 6
- AAPL in META's comparables: Yes
- META in AAPL's comparables: No
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 4% vs 21%
- Profit Margin: 24% vs 38%
- ROE: 137% vs 37%
- Operating Margin: 35% vs 45%
- Revenue (TTM): $395.8B vs $164.5B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $3,626.3B vs $1,693.0B
Size Category: Mega Cap vs Mega Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 38.26 vs 28.02
- P/B Ratio: 54.42 vs 9.27
- EV/EBITDA: 26.76 vs 19.16
- Forward P/E: 32.89 vs 26.32
- PEG Ratio: 2.24 vs 1.34
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: TECHNOLOGY vs TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: ELECTRONIC COMPUTERS vs SERVICES-COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, DATA PROCESSING, ETC.
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- AAPL Rating: Buy
- META Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- AAPL Country: USA
- META Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NMS vs NMS
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- AAPL Beta: 1.20 (Average)
- META Beta: 1.20 (Average)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
business similarity
Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.
This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.
A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- AAPL Price vs 200-day MA: 106.87%
- META Price vs 200-day MA: 118.76%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- AAPL Dividend Yield: 0%
- META Dividend Yield: 0%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Netflix, Inc.
NFLX - NMSNetflix, Inc. is an American over-the-top content platform and production company headquartered in Los Gatos, California. Netflix was founded in 1997 by Reed Hastings and Marc Randolph in Scotts Valley, California. The company's primary business is a subscription-based streaming service offering online streaming from a library of films and television series, including those produced in-house.
Netflix, Inc. offers streaming services that connect users through entertainment, akin to Meta's focus on engaging users through social media and VR technologies. Both companies are major players in the digital content space.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 36%
R-squared: 13%
This indicates a weak positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 4
- META in NFLX's comparables: No
- NFLX in META's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 21% vs 16%
- Profit Margin: 38% vs 22%
- ROE: 37% vs 38%
- Operating Margin: 45% vs 22%
- Revenue (TTM): $164.5B vs $39.0B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $1,693.0B vs $419.4B
Size Category: Mega Cap vs Mega Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 28.02 vs 49.50
- P/B Ratio: 9.27 vs 16.95
- EV/EBITDA: 19.16 vs 16.17
- Forward P/E: 26.32 vs 40.00
- PEG Ratio: 1.34 vs 1.78
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: TECHNOLOGY vs TRADE & SERVICES
- Industry: SERVICES-COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, DATA PROCESSING, ETC. vs SERVICES-VIDEO TAPE RENTAL
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- META Rating: Buy
- NFLX Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- META Country: USA
- NFLX Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NMS vs NMS
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- META Beta: 1.20 (Average)
- NFLX Beta: 1.27 (High)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
business similarity
Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.
This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.
A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- META Price vs 200-day MA: 118.76%
- NFLX Price vs 200-day MA: 127.15%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Loading comparable stocks ...
Microsoft Corporation
MSFT - NMSMicrosoft Corporation is an American multinational technology company which produces computer software, consumer electronics, personal computers, and related services. Its best known software products...
Microsoft Corporation is an American multinational technology company which produces computer software, consumer electronics, personal computers, and related services. Its best known software products are the Microsoft Windows line of operating systems, the Microsoft Office suite, and the Internet Explorer and Edge web browsers. Its flagship hardware products are the Xbox video game consoles and the Microsoft Surface lineup of touchscreen personal computers. Microsoft ranked No. 21 in the 2020 Fortune 500 rankings of the largest United States corporations by total revenue; it was the world's largest software maker by revenue as of 2016. It is considered one of the Big Five companies in the U.S. information technology industry, along with Google, Apple, Amazon, and Facebook.
Alphabet Inc.
GOOGL - NMSAlphabet Inc. is an American multinational conglomerate headquartered in Mountain View, California. It was created through a restructuring of Google on October 2, 2015, and became the parent company o...
Alphabet Inc. is an American multinational conglomerate headquartered in Mountain View, California. It was created through a restructuring of Google on October 2, 2015, and became the parent company of Google and several former Google subsidiaries. The two co-founders of Google remained as controlling shareholders, board members, and employees at Alphabet. Alphabet is the world's fourth-largest technology company by revenue and one of the world's most valuable companies.
Amazon.com, Inc.
AMZN - NMSAmazon.com, Inc. is an American multinational technology company which focuses on e-commerce, cloud computing, digital streaming, and artificial intelligence. It is one of the Big Five companies in th...
Amazon.com, Inc. is an American multinational technology company which focuses on e-commerce, cloud computing, digital streaming, and artificial intelligence. It is one of the Big Five companies in the U.S. information technology industry, along with Google, Apple, Microsoft, and Facebook. The company has been referred to as one of the most influential economic and cultural forces in the world, as well as the world's most valuable brand.
Alphabet Inc.
GOOG - NMSAlphabet Inc. is an American multinational conglomerate headquartered in Mountain View, California. It was created through a restructuring of Google on October 2, 2015, and became the parent company o...
Alphabet Inc. is an American multinational conglomerate headquartered in Mountain View, California. It was created through a restructuring of Google on October 2, 2015, and became the parent company of Google and several former Google subsidiaries. The two co-founders of Google remained as controlling shareholders, board members, and employees at Alphabet. Alphabet is the world's fourth-largest technology company by revenue and one of the world's most valuable companies.
Apple Inc.
AAPL - NMSApple Inc. is an American multinational technology company that specializes in consumer electronics, computer software, and online services. Apple is the world's largest technology company by revenue...
Apple Inc. is an American multinational technology company that specializes in consumer electronics, computer software, and online services. Apple is the world's largest technology company by revenue (totalling $274.5 billion in 2020) and, since January 2021, the world's most valuable company. As of 2021, Apple is the world's fourth-largest PC vendor by unit sales, and fourth-largest smartphone manufacturer. It is one of the Big Five American information technology companies, along with Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and Facebook.
Netflix, Inc.
NFLX - NMSNetflix, Inc. is an American over-the-top content platform and production company headquartered in Los Gatos, California. Netflix was founded in 1997 by Reed Hastings and Marc Randolph in Scotts Valle...
Netflix, Inc. is an American over-the-top content platform and production company headquartered in Los Gatos, California. Netflix was founded in 1997 by Reed Hastings and Marc Randolph in Scotts Valley, California. The company's primary business is a subscription-based streaming service offering online streaming from a library of films and television series, including those produced in-house.