Find Comparable ETFs for The Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF Fund
The Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF Fund
XLC - PCXFidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF
FCOM - PCXThe Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund is a direct competitor to FCOM, focusing on similar large-cap communication services companies, offering investors a way to gain exposure to the same sector.
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 96%
R-squared: 91%
This indicates a strong positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 4
- FCOM in XLC's comparables: No
- XLC in FCOM's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the assets are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 18.47 vs 15.99
A high score indicates that the market values these assets similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- FCOM Beta: 1.02 (Average)
- XLC Beta: 1.02 (Average)
- FCOM 200-day Volatility: 15.94%
- XLC 200-day Volatility: 15.14%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- FCOM Price vs 200-day MA: 109%
- XLC Price vs 200-day MA: 111%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | FCOM | XLC |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 23% | 27% |
| Year_3 | -2% | 2% |
| Year_5 | 9% | 12% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: PCX vs PCX
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Large Cap Growth Equities vs Large Cap Growth Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- FCOM Dividend Yield: 1%
- XLC Dividend Yield: 1%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Vanguard Communication Services Index Fund ETF Shares
VOX - PCXThe Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund includes major companies in the communication services sector, similar to VOX, and offers exposure to a wide range of communication-related stocks.
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 96%
R-squared: 92%
This indicates a strong positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 3
- VOX in XLC's comparables: No
- XLC in VOX's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the assets are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 19.30 vs 15.99
A high score indicates that the market values these assets similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- VOX Beta: 1.04 (Average)
- XLC Beta: 1.02 (Average)
- VOX 200-day Volatility: 15.93%
- XLC 200-day Volatility: 15.14%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- VOX Price vs 200-day MA: 109%
- XLC Price vs 200-day MA: 111%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | VOX | XLC |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 23% | 27% |
| Year_3 | -2% | 2% |
| Year_5 | 10% | 12% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: PCX vs PCX
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Large Cap Growth Equities vs Large Cap Growth Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- VOX Dividend Yield: 1%
- XLC Dividend Yield: 1%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund
FDN - PCXThis ETF encompasses communication services, which overlaps with the internet sector, providing a comparable investment avenue to FDN.
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 77%
R-squared: 60%
This indicates a strong positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 3
- FDN in XLC's comparables: Yes
- XLC in FDN's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the assets are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 31.05 vs 15.99
A high score indicates that the market values these assets similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- FDN Beta: 1.12 (Average)
- XLC Beta: 1.02 (Average)
- FDN 200-day Volatility: 18.26%
- XLC 200-day Volatility: 15.14%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- FDN Price vs 200-day MA: 111%
- XLC Price vs 200-day MA: 111%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | FDN | XLC |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 14% | 27% |
| Year_3 | -8% | 2% |
| Year_5 | 5% | 12% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: PCX vs PCX
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Large Cap Growth Equities vs Large Cap Growth Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- FDN Dividend Yield: 0%
- XLC Dividend Yield: 1%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
SPY - PCX
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 74%
R-squared: 54%
This indicates a strong positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 2
- SPY in XLC's comparables: No
- XLC in SPY's comparables: No
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the assets are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 17.86 vs 15.99
A high score indicates that the market values these assets similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- SPY Beta: 1.00 (Average)
- XLC Beta: 1.02 (Average)
- SPY 200-day Volatility: 11.69%
- XLC 200-day Volatility: 15.14%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- SPY Price vs 200-day MA: 104%
- XLC Price vs 200-day MA: 111%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | SPY | XLC |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 20% | 27% |
| Year_3 | 8% | 2% |
| Year_5 | 14% | 12% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: PCX vs PCX
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Large Cap Growth Equities vs Large Cap Growth Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- SPY Dividend Yield: 1%
- XLC Dividend Yield: 1%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
The Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund
XLK - PCXWhile primarily focused on communication services, XLC includes significant tech components, providing a broader tech-related investment option.
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 58%
R-squared: 34%
This indicates a moderate positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 2
- XLC in XLK's comparables: Yes
- XLK in XLC's comparables: No
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the assets are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 15.99 vs 23.77
A high score indicates that the market values these assets similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- XLC Beta: 1.02 (Average)
- XLK Beta: 1.14 (Average)
- XLC 200-day Volatility: 15.14%
- XLK 200-day Volatility: 22.59%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- XLC Price vs 200-day MA: 111%
- XLK Price vs 200-day MA: 100%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | XLC | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 27% | 19% |
| Year_3 | 2% | 11% |
| Year_5 | 12% | 22% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: PCX vs PCX
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Large Cap Growth Equities vs Technology Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- XLC Dividend Yield: 1%
- XLK Dividend Yield: 1%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
The Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
XLY - PCX
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 67%
R-squared: 45%
This indicates a moderate positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 1
- XLC in XLY's comparables: No
- XLY in XLC's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the assets are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 15.99 vs 24.20
A high score indicates that the market values these assets similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- XLC Beta: 1.02 (Average)
- XLY Beta: 1.18 (Average)
- XLC 200-day Volatility: 15.14%
- XLY 200-day Volatility: 17.75%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- XLC Price vs 200-day MA: 111%
- XLY Price vs 200-day MA: 107%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | XLC | XLY |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 27% | 5% |
| Year_3 | 2% | 0% |
| Year_5 | 12% | 9% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: PCX vs PCX
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Large Cap Growth Equities vs Consumer Discretionary Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- XLC Dividend Yield: 1%
- XLY Dividend Yield: 1%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
VGT - PCX
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 60%
R-squared: 36%
This indicates a moderate positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 2
- VGT in XLC's comparables: Yes
- XLC in VGT's comparables: No
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the assets are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 27.40 vs 15.99
A high score indicates that the market values these assets similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- VGT Beta: 1.16 (Average)
- XLC Beta: 1.02 (Average)
- VGT 200-day Volatility: 21.58%
- XLC 200-day Volatility: 15.14%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- VGT Price vs 200-day MA: 101%
- XLC Price vs 200-day MA: 111%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | VGT | XLC |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 22% | 27% |
| Year_3 | 10% | 2% |
| Year_5 | 21% | 12% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: PCX vs PCX
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Technology Equities vs Large Cap Growth Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- VGT Dividend Yield: 0%
- XLC Dividend Yield: 1%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF
IYZ - BTSThis ETF tracks the performance of companies in the communication services sector, similar to IYZ's focus on telecommunications, making it a relevant comparison.
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 50%
R-squared: 25%
This indicates a moderate positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 2
- IYZ in XLC's comparables: No
- XLC in IYZ's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the assets are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 12.26 vs 15.99
A high score indicates that the market values these assets similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- IYZ Beta: 0.88 (Average)
- XLC Beta: 1.02 (Average)
- IYZ 200-day Volatility: 13.59%
- XLC 200-day Volatility: 15.14%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- IYZ Price vs 200-day MA: 114%
- XLC Price vs 200-day MA: 111%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | IYZ | XLC |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 3% | 27% |
| Year_3 | -11% | 2% |
| Year_5 | -3% | 12% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: BTS vs PCX
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Communications Equities vs Large Cap Growth Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- IYZ Dividend Yield: 2%
- XLC Dividend Yield: 1%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
IYW - PCX
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 64%
R-squared: 41%
This indicates a moderate positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 1
- IYW in XLC's comparables: Yes
- XLC in IYW's comparables: No
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the assets are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 26.80 vs 15.99
A high score indicates that the market values these assets similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- IYW Beta: 1.15 (Average)
- XLC Beta: 1.02 (Average)
- IYW 200-day Volatility: 22.14%
- XLC 200-day Volatility: 15.14%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- IYW Price vs 200-day MA: 101%
- XLC Price vs 200-day MA: 111%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | IYW | XLC |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 26% | 27% |
| Year_3 | 11% | 2% |
| Year_5 | 22% | 12% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: PCX vs PCX
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Technology Equities vs Large Cap Growth Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- IYW Dividend Yield: 0%
- XLC Dividend Yield: 1%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
RYT - PCXThe Communication Services ETF includes major tech-related companies and offers a broader view of the technology influence in communication, relevant for tech investors.
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 57%
R-squared: 32%
This indicates a moderate positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 2
- RYT in XLC's comparables: No
- XLC in RYT's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the assets are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 25.56 vs 15.99
A high score indicates that the market values these assets similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- RYT Price vs 200-day MA: 109%
- XLC Price vs 200-day MA: 111%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | RYT | XLC |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 0% | 27% |
| Year_3 | 0% | 2% |
| Year_5 | 0% | 12% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: PCX vs PCX
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
Loading comparable ETFs ...