Find Comparable Stocks for NIO Inc.
NIO Inc.
NIO - NYQNIO Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells smart electric vehicles in mainland China, Hong Kong, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany. The company is headquartered in Shanghai, China.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
XPeng Inc.
XPEV - NYQXPeng Inc. designs, develops, manufactures and markets smart electric vehicles in the People's Republic of China. The company is headquartered in Guangzhou, the People's Republic of China.
XPeng Inc. operates in the same industry and market as NIO, offering electric vehicles and smart technology, making it a direct competitor in the Chinese EV landscape.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 70%
R-squared: 48%
This indicates a moderate positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 6
- NIO in XPEV's comparables: Yes
- XPEV in NIO's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: -2% vs 18%
- Profit Margin: -34% vs -15%
- ROE: -117% vs -19%
- Operating Margin: -28% vs -17%
- Revenue (TTM): $63.1B vs $37.8B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $9.4B vs $20.5B
Size Category: Mid Cap vs Large Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 0.00 vs 0.00
- P/B Ratio: 5.68 vs 4.37
- EV/EBITDA: -0.61 vs -0.75
- Forward P/E: 434.78 vs 0.00
- PEG Ratio: 0.00 vs 0.00
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: MANUFACTURING vs MANUFACTURING
- Industry: MOTOR VEHICLES & PASSENGER CAR BODIES vs MOTOR VEHICLES & PASSENGER CAR BODIES
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- NIO Rating: Buy
- XPEV Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- NIO Beta: 1.81 (High)
- XPEV Beta: 2.67 (Very High)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
business similarity
Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.
This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.
A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- NIO Price vs 200-day MA: 92.81%
- XPEV Price vs 200-day MA: 194.06%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Li Auto Inc.
LI - NMSLi Auto Inc. designs, develops, manufactures and sells smart electric sport utility vehicles (SUVs) in China. The company is headquartered in Beijing, China.
NIO Inc. is a direct competitor in the Chinese electric vehicle market, focusing on premium electric SUVs, similar to Li Auto's offerings.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 58%
R-squared: 34%
This indicates a moderate positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 7
- LI in NIO's comparables: Yes
- NIO in LI's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 24% vs -2%
- Profit Margin: 7% vs -34%
- ROE: 17% vs -117%
- Operating Margin: 8% vs -28%
- Revenue (TTM): $141.9B vs $63.1B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $30.3B vs $9.4B
Size Category: Large Cap vs Mid Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 21.82 vs 0.00
- P/B Ratio: 3.35 vs 5.68
- EV/EBITDA: 14.18 vs -0.61
- Forward P/E: 29.50 vs 434.78
- PEG Ratio: 2.38 vs 0.00
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: MANUFACTURING vs MANUFACTURING
- Industry: MOTOR VEHICLES & PASSENGER CAR BODIES vs MOTOR VEHICLES & PASSENGER CAR BODIES
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- LI Rating: Buy
- NIO Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- LI Country: China
- NIO Country: China
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NMS vs NYQ
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- LI Beta: 0.85 (Low)
- NIO Beta: 1.81 (High)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
business similarity
Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.
This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.
A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- LI Price vs 200-day MA: 127.79%
- NIO Price vs 200-day MA: 92.81%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
BYD Company Limited
BYDDY - PNKNIO Inc. is a Chinese electric vehicle manufacturer, similar to BYD, focusing on the EV market and benefiting from the increasing demand for electric vehicles.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 56%
R-squared: 31%
This indicates a moderate positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 6
- BYDDY in NIO's comparables: Yes
- NIO in BYDDY's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 0% vs -2%
- Profit Margin: 0% vs -34%
- ROE: 0% vs -117%
- Operating Margin: 0% vs -28%
- Revenue (TTM): $0 vs $63.1B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $139.2B vs $9.4B
Size Category: Large Cap vs Mid Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: vs MANUFACTURING
- Industry: vs MOTOR VEHICLES & PASSENGER CAR BODIES
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- BYDDY Country:
- NIO Country: China
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: PNK vs NYQ
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- BYDDY Price vs 200-day MA: 133.58%
- NIO Price vs 200-day MA: 92.81%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Ford Motor Company
F - NYQFord Motor Company, commonly known as Ford, is an American multinational automaker that has its main headquarters in Dearborn, Michigan.
Ford Motor Company is transitioning towards electric vehicles and offers a variety of EV models, making it comparable as it adapts to the same market trends as NIO.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 13%
R-squared: 2%
This indicates a negligible relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 2
- F in NIO's comparables: Yes
- NIO in F's comparables: No
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 5% vs -2%
- Profit Margin: 3% vs -34%
- ROE: 14% vs -117%
- Operating Margin: 2% vs -28%
- Revenue (TTM): $185.0B vs $63.1B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $37.4B vs $9.4B
Size Category: Large Cap vs Mid Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 6.47 vs 0.00
- P/B Ratio: 0.83 vs 5.68
- EV/EBITDA: 11.22 vs -0.61
- Forward P/E: 7.45 vs 434.78
- PEG Ratio: 3.24 vs 0.00
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: MANUFACTURING vs MANUFACTURING
- Industry: MOTOR VEHICLES & PASSENGER CAR BODIES vs MOTOR VEHICLES & PASSENGER CAR BODIES
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- F Rating: Hold
- NIO Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- F Beta: 1.61 (High)
- NIO Beta: 1.81 (High)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
business similarity
Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.
This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.
A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- F Price vs 200-day MA: 86.46%
- NIO Price vs 200-day MA: 92.81%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Plug Power Inc.
PLUG - NCMPlug Power Inc. provides turnkey hydrogen fuel cell solutions for the stationary power and electric mobility markets in North America and Europe. The company is headquartered in Latham, New York.
NIO Inc. operates in the electric vehicle market and shares a similar growth trajectory and innovation focus, appealing to investors interested in clean energy technologies.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 37%
R-squared: 14%
This indicates a weak positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 1
- NIO in PLUG's comparables: Yes
- PLUG in NIO's comparables: No
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: -2% vs -14%
- Profit Margin: -34% vs 0%
- ROE: -117% vs -90%
- Operating Margin: -28% vs -213%
- Revenue (TTM): $63.1B vs $628.8M
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $9.4B vs $1.5B
Size Category: Mid Cap vs Small Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 0.00 vs 0.00
- P/B Ratio: 5.68 vs 0.90
- EV/EBITDA: -0.61 vs -2.23
- Forward P/E: 434.78 vs 0.00
- PEG Ratio: 0.00 vs -0.27
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: MANUFACTURING vs MANUFACTURING
- Industry: MOTOR VEHICLES & PASSENGER CAR BODIES vs ELECTRICAL INDUSTRIAL APPARATUS
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- NIO Rating: Buy
- PLUG Rating: Hold
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- NIO Country: China
- PLUG Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NYQ vs NCM
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- NIO Beta: 1.81 (High)
- PLUG Beta: 1.98 (High)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
business similarity
Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.
This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.
A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- NIO Price vs 200-day MA: 92.81%
- PLUG Price vs 200-day MA: 72.37%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
Select Mutual Comparables:
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Albemarle Corporation
ALB - NYQAlbemarle Corporation is a fine chemical manufacturing company based in Charlotte, North Carolina.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 44%
R-squared: 20%
This indicates a weak positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 0
- ALB in NIO's comparables: No
- NIO in ALB's comparables: No
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: -48% vs -2%
- Profit Margin: -22% vs -34%
- ROE: -11% vs -117%
- Operating Margin: 2% vs -28%
- Revenue (TTM): $5.4B vs $63.1B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $8.7B vs $9.4B
Size Category: Mid Cap vs Mid Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 0.00 vs 0.00
- P/B Ratio: 1.06 vs 5.68
- EV/EBITDA: 22.45 vs -0.61
- Forward P/E: 18.45 vs 434.78
- PEG Ratio: 0.99 vs 0.00
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: LIFE SCIENCES vs MANUFACTURING
- Industry: PLASTIC MATERIALS, SYNTH RESINS & NONVULCAN ELASTOMERS vs MOTOR VEHICLES & PASSENGER CAR BODIES
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- ALB Rating: Hold
- NIO Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- ALB Beta: 1.70 (High)
- NIO Beta: 1.81 (High)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- ALB Price vs 200-day MA: 77.98%
- NIO Price vs 200-day MA: 92.81%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Loading comparable stocks ...
XPeng Inc.
XPEV - NYQXPeng Inc. designs, develops, manufactures and markets smart electric vehicles in the People's Republic of China. The company is headquartered in Guangzhou, the People's Republic of China.
XPeng Inc. designs, develops, manufactures and markets smart electric vehicles in the People's Republic of China. The company is headquartered in Guangzhou, the People's Republic of China.
Li Auto Inc.
LI - NMSLi Auto Inc. designs, develops, manufactures and sells smart electric sport utility vehicles (SUVs) in China. The company is headquartered in Beijing, China.
Li Auto Inc. designs, develops, manufactures and sells smart electric sport utility vehicles (SUVs) in China. The company is headquartered in Beijing, China.
BYD Company Limited
BYDDY - PNKFord Motor Company
F - NYQFord Motor Company, commonly known as Ford, is an American multinational automaker that has its main headquarters in Dearborn, Michigan.
Ford Motor Company, commonly known as Ford, is an American multinational automaker that has its main headquarters in Dearborn, Michigan.
Plug Power Inc.
PLUG - NCMPlug Power Inc. provides turnkey hydrogen fuel cell solutions for the stationary power and electric mobility markets in North America and Europe. The company is headquartered in Latham, New York.
Plug Power Inc. provides turnkey hydrogen fuel cell solutions for the stationary power and electric mobility markets in North America and Europe. The company is headquartered in Latham, New York.
Albemarle Corporation
ALB - NYQAlbemarle Corporation is a fine chemical manufacturing company based in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Albemarle Corporation is a fine chemical manufacturing company based in Charlotte, North Carolina.