Find Comparable Stocks for Albemarle Corporation
Albemarle Corporation
ALB - NYQAlbemarle Corporation is a fine chemical manufacturing company based in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.
SQM - NYQSociedad Qumica y Minera de Chile SA produces and distributes specialty plant nutrients, iodine and its derivatives, lithium and its derivatives, potassium chloride and sulfate, industrial chemicals and other products and services worldwide. The company is headquartered in Santiago, Chile.
Albemarle Corporation is a leading producer of lithium and specialty chemicals, making it a direct competitor to SQM in the lithium market, which is crucial for battery production and various industrial applications.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 62%
R-squared: 39%
This indicates a moderate positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 3
- ALB in SQM's comparables: Yes
- SQM in ALB's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: -48% vs -42%
- Profit Margin: -22% vs -7%
- ROE: -11% vs -6%
- Operating Margin: 2% vs 21%
- Revenue (TTM): $5.4B vs $4.8B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $8.7B vs $11.0B
Size Category: Mid Cap vs Large Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 0.00 vs 0.00
- P/B Ratio: 1.06 vs 2.10
- EV/EBITDA: 22.45 vs 10.43
- Forward P/E: 18.45 vs 8.66
- PEG Ratio: 0.99 vs 1.50
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: LIFE SCIENCES vs ENERGY & TRANSPORTATION
- Industry: PLASTIC MATERIALS, SYNTH RESINS & NONVULCAN ELASTOMERS vs MINING & QUARRYING OF NONMETALLIC MINERALS (NO FUELS)
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- ALB Rating: Hold
- SQM Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- ALB Country: USA
- SQM Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NYQ vs NYQ
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- ALB Beta: 1.70 (High)
- SQM Beta: 1.10 (Average)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- ALB Price vs 200-day MA: 77.98%
- SQM Price vs 200-day MA: 100.43%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- ALB Dividend Yield: 2%
- SQM Dividend Yield: 6%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Huntsman Corporation
HUN - NYQHuntsman Corporation manufactures and sells differentiated organic chemicals globally. The company is headquartered in The Woodlands, Texas.
Huntsman Corporation operates in the specialty chemicals sector, providing a range of products that can compete with Albemarle's offerings in plastics and resins.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 42%
R-squared: 18%
This indicates a weak positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 5
- ALB in HUN's comparables: Yes
- HUN in ALB's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: -48% vs 4%
- Profit Margin: -22% vs -3%
- ROE: -11% vs -3%
- Operating Margin: 2% vs 0%
- Revenue (TTM): $5.4B vs $6.0B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $8.7B vs $3.1B
Size Category: Mid Cap vs Mid Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 0.00 vs 0.00
- P/B Ratio: 1.06 vs 0.94
- EV/EBITDA: 22.45 vs 14.20
- Forward P/E: 18.45 vs 50.00
- PEG Ratio: 0.99 vs 1.79
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: LIFE SCIENCES vs LIFE SCIENCES
- Industry: PLASTIC MATERIALS, SYNTH RESINS & NONVULCAN ELASTOMERS vs CHEMICALS & ALLIED PRODUCTS
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- ALB Rating: Hold
- HUN Rating: Hold
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- ALB Country: USA
- HUN Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NYQ vs NYQ
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- ALB Beta: 1.70 (High)
- HUN Beta: 0.98 (Average)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- ALB Price vs 200-day MA: 77.98%
- HUN Price vs 200-day MA: 84.97%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- ALB Dividend Yield: 2%
- HUN Dividend Yield: 6%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
FMC Corporation
FMC - NYQFMC Corporation (Food Machinery and Chemical Corporation) is an American chemical manufacturing company headquartered in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
FMC Corporation is heavily involved in the agricultural and lithium sectors, offering products that overlap with Albemarle's market focus on fine chemicals and specialty materials.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 25%
R-squared: 6%
This indicates a negligible relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 3
- ALB in FMC's comparables: No
- FMC in ALB's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: -48% vs 7%
- Profit Margin: -22% vs 8%
- ROE: -11% vs 9%
- Operating Margin: 2% vs 17%
- Revenue (TTM): $5.4B vs $4.2B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $8.7B vs $5.0B
Size Category: Mid Cap vs Mid Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 0.00 vs 12.54
- P/B Ratio: 1.06 vs 1.10
- EV/EBITDA: 22.45 vs 12.13
- Forward P/E: 18.45 vs 11.15
- PEG Ratio: 0.99 vs 1.85
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: LIFE SCIENCES vs LIFE SCIENCES
- Industry: PLASTIC MATERIALS, SYNTH RESINS & NONVULCAN ELASTOMERS vs CHEMICALS & ALLIED PRODUCTS
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- ALB Rating: Hold
- FMC Rating: Hold
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- ALB Country: USA
- FMC Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NYQ vs NYQ
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- ALB Beta: 1.70 (High)
- FMC Beta: 0.95 (Average)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- ALB Price vs 200-day MA: 77.98%
- FMC Price vs 200-day MA: 71.06%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- ALB Dividend Yield: 2%
- FMC Dividend Yield: 6%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Nutrien Ltd.
NTR - NYQNutrien Ltd. provides inputs, services and solutions for crops. The company is headquartered in Saskatoon, Canada.
Nutrien Ltd. is a major player in the agricultural sector, with a focus on potash and nitrogen products, and shares market dynamics and customer bases with Albemarle in certain specialty chemicals.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 48%
R-squared: 23%
This indicates a weak positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 0
- ALB in NTR's comparables: No
- NTR in ALB's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: -48% vs -10%
- Profit Margin: -22% vs 3%
- ROE: -11% vs 3%
- Operating Margin: 2% vs 9%
- Revenue (TTM): $5.4B vs $25.0B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $8.7B vs $24.9B
Size Category: Mid Cap vs Large Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 0.00 vs 37.39
- P/B Ratio: 1.06 vs 0.97
- EV/EBITDA: 22.45 vs 8.50
- Forward P/E: 18.45 vs 12.63
- PEG Ratio: 0.99 vs 1.24
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: LIFE SCIENCES vs LIFE SCIENCES
- Industry: PLASTIC MATERIALS, SYNTH RESINS & NONVULCAN ELASTOMERS vs AGRICULTURAL CHEMICALS
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- ALB Rating: Hold
- NTR Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- ALB Country: USA
- NTR Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NYQ vs NYQ
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- ALB Beta: 1.70 (High)
- NTR Beta: 0.96 (Average)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- ALB Price vs 200-day MA: 77.98%
- NTR Price vs 200-day MA: 102.44%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- ALB Dividend Yield: 2%
- NTR Dividend Yield: 5%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
NIO Inc.
NIO - NYQNIO Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells smart electric vehicles in mainland China, Hong Kong, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany. The company is headquartered in Shanghai, China.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 44%
R-squared: 20%
This indicates a weak positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 0
- ALB in NIO's comparables: No
- NIO in ALB's comparables: No
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: -48% vs -2%
- Profit Margin: -22% vs -34%
- ROE: -11% vs -117%
- Operating Margin: 2% vs -28%
- Revenue (TTM): $5.4B vs $63.1B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $8.7B vs $9.4B
Size Category: Mid Cap vs Mid Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 0.00 vs 0.00
- P/B Ratio: 1.06 vs 5.68
- EV/EBITDA: 22.45 vs -0.61
- Forward P/E: 18.45 vs 434.78
- PEG Ratio: 0.99 vs 0.00
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: LIFE SCIENCES vs MANUFACTURING
- Industry: PLASTIC MATERIALS, SYNTH RESINS & NONVULCAN ELASTOMERS vs MOTOR VEHICLES & PASSENGER CAR BODIES
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- ALB Rating: Hold
- NIO Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- ALB Beta: 1.70 (High)
- NIO Beta: 1.81 (High)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- ALB Price vs 200-day MA: 77.98%
- NIO Price vs 200-day MA: 92.81%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Lennar Corporation
LEN - NYQLennar Corporation is a home construction and real estate company based in Fontainebleau, Florida.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 36%
R-squared: 13%
This indicates a weak positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 0
- ALB in LEN's comparables: No
- LEN in ALB's comparables: No
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: -48% vs -9%
- Profit Margin: -22% vs 11%
- ROE: -11% vs 15%
- Operating Margin: 2% vs 16%
- Revenue (TTM): $5.4B vs $35.4B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $8.7B vs $33.2B
Size Category: Mid Cap vs Large Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 0.00 vs 8.82
- P/B Ratio: 1.06 vs 1.20
- EV/EBITDA: 22.45 vs 6.53
- Forward P/E: 18.45 vs 9.92
- PEG Ratio: 0.99 vs 1.20
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: LIFE SCIENCES vs REAL ESTATE & CONSTRUCTION
- Industry: PLASTIC MATERIALS, SYNTH RESINS & NONVULCAN ELASTOMERS vs GENERAL BLDG CONTRACTORS - RESIDENTIAL BLDGS
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- ALB Rating: Hold
- LEN Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- ALB Country: USA
- LEN Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NYQ vs NYQ
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- ALB Beta: 1.70 (High)
- LEN Beta: 1.71 (High)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- ALB Price vs 200-day MA: 77.98%
- LEN Price vs 200-day MA: 81.50%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- ALB Dividend Yield: 2%
- LEN Dividend Yield: 2%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
CRWD - NMSCrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 11%
R-squared: 1%
This indicates a negligible relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 0
- ALB in CRWD's comparables: No
- CRWD in ALB's comparables: No
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: -48% vs 29%
- Profit Margin: -22% vs 3%
- ROE: -11% vs 5%
- Operating Margin: 2% vs -6%
- Revenue (TTM): $5.4B vs $3.7B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $8.7B vs $90.0B
Size Category: Mid Cap vs Large Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 0.00 vs 716.55
- P/B Ratio: 1.06 vs 30.83
- EV/EBITDA: 22.45 vs 230.17
- Forward P/E: 18.45 vs 88.50
- PEG Ratio: 0.99 vs 1.72
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: LIFE SCIENCES vs TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: PLASTIC MATERIALS, SYNTH RESINS & NONVULCAN ELASTOMERS vs SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- ALB Rating: Hold
- CRWD Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- ALB Country: USA
- CRWD Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NYQ vs NMS
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- ALB Beta: 1.70 (High)
- CRWD Beta: 1.19 (Average)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- ALB Price vs 200-day MA: 77.98%
- CRWD Price vs 200-day MA: 109.61%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Loading comparable stocks ...
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.
SQM - NYQSociedad Qumica y Minera de Chile SA produces and distributes specialty plant nutrients, iodine and its derivatives, lithium and its derivatives, potassium chloride and sulfate, industrial chemicals a...
Sociedad Qumica y Minera de Chile SA produces and distributes specialty plant nutrients, iodine and its derivatives, lithium and its derivatives, potassium chloride and sulfate, industrial chemicals and other products and services worldwide. The company is headquartered in Santiago, Chile.
Huntsman Corporation
HUN - NYQHuntsman Corporation manufactures and sells differentiated organic chemicals globally. The company is headquartered in The Woodlands, Texas.
Huntsman Corporation manufactures and sells differentiated organic chemicals globally. The company is headquartered in The Woodlands, Texas.
FMC Corporation
FMC - NYQFMC Corporation (Food Machinery and Chemical Corporation) is an American chemical manufacturing company headquartered in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
FMC Corporation (Food Machinery and Chemical Corporation) is an American chemical manufacturing company headquartered in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Nutrien Ltd.
NTR - NYQNutrien Ltd. provides inputs, services and solutions for crops. The company is headquartered in Saskatoon, Canada.
Nutrien Ltd. provides inputs, services and solutions for crops. The company is headquartered in Saskatoon, Canada.
NIO Inc.
NIO - NYQNIO Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells smart electric vehicles in mainland China, Hong Kong, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany. The company is headquartered in Shanghai,...
NIO Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells smart electric vehicles in mainland China, Hong Kong, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany. The company is headquartered in Shanghai, China.
Lennar Corporation
LEN - NYQLennar Corporation is a home construction and real estate company based in Fontainebleau, Florida.
Lennar Corporation is a home construction and real estate company based in Fontainebleau, Florida.
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
CRWD - NMSCrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is...
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.