Find Comparable Stocks for ServiceNow, Inc.
ServiceNow, Inc.
NOW - NYQServiceNow is an American software company based in Santa Clara, California that develops a cloud computing platform to help companies manage digital workflows for enterprise operations.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Salesforce, Inc.
CRM - NYQSalesforce.com, Inc. is an American cloud-based software company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It provides customer relationship management (CRM) service and also provides a complementary suite of enterprise applications focused on customer service, marketing automation, analytics, and application development.
ServiceNow, Inc. specializes in digital workflows and automation software, similar to Salesforce's suite of enterprise applications, focusing on improving customer service and operational efficiency.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 66%
R-squared: 43%
This indicates a moderate positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 7
- CRM in NOW's comparables: Yes
- NOW in CRM's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 8% vs 21%
- Profit Margin: 16% vs 13%
- ROE: 10% vs 17%
- Operating Margin: 21% vs 14%
- Revenue (TTM): $37.9B vs $11.0B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $275.5B vs $187.8B
Size Category: Mega Cap vs Large Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 45.34 vs 133.72
- P/B Ratio: 4.59 vs 19.56
- EV/EBITDA: 24.93 vs 79.35
- Forward P/E: 26.32 vs 55.25
- PEG Ratio: 1.62 vs 2.05
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: TECHNOLOGY vs TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE vs SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- CRM Rating: Buy
- NOW Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- CRM Country: USA
- NOW Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NYQ vs NYQ
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- CRM Beta: 1.35 (High)
- NOW Beta: 1.03 (Average)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
business similarity
Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.
This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.
A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- CRM Price vs 200-day MA: 99.32%
- NOW Price vs 200-day MA: 99.91%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Microsoft Corporation
MSFT - NMSMicrosoft Corporation is an American multinational technology company which produces computer software, consumer electronics, personal computers, and related services. Its best known software products are the Microsoft Windows line of operating systems, the Microsoft Office suite, and the Internet Explorer and Edge web browsers. Its flagship hardware products are the Xbox video game consoles and the Microsoft Surface lineup of touchscreen personal computers. Microsoft ranked No. 21 in the 2020 Fortune 500 rankings of the largest United States corporations by total revenue; it was the world's largest software maker by revenue as of 2016. It is considered one of the Big Five companies in the U.S. information technology industry, along with Google, Apple, Amazon, and Facebook.
Microsoft has a strong presence in cloud computing with its Azure platform and productivity tools, making it comparable due to its focus on enterprise software and digital transformation.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 67%
R-squared: 45%
This indicates a moderate positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 5
- MSFT in NOW's comparables: Yes
- NOW in MSFT's comparables: No
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 12% vs 21%
- Profit Margin: 35% vs 13%
- ROE: 34% vs 17%
- Operating Margin: 46% vs 14%
- Revenue (TTM): $261.8B vs $11.0B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $2,951.1B vs $187.8B
Size Category: Mega Cap vs Large Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 31.94 vs 133.72
- P/B Ratio: 9.75 vs 19.56
- EV/EBITDA: 20.59 vs 79.35
- Forward P/E: 30.21 vs 55.25
- PEG Ratio: 2.07 vs 2.05
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: TECHNOLOGY vs TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE vs SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- MSFT Rating: Buy
- NOW Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- MSFT Country: USA
- NOW Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NMS vs NYQ
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- MSFT Beta: 0.90 (Average)
- NOW Beta: 1.03 (Average)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
business similarity
Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.
This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.
A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- MSFT Price vs 200-day MA: 93.19%
- NOW Price vs 200-day MA: 99.91%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
SAP SE
SAP - NYQSAP SE is a global enterprise application software company. The company is headquartered in Walldorf, Germany.
SAP SE specializes in enterprise software solutions, particularly in enterprise resource planning, which aligns with ServiceNow's offerings in managing digital workflows.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 31%
R-squared: 10%
This indicates a weak positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 6
- NOW in SAP's comparables: No
- SAP in NOW's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 21% vs 11%
- Profit Margin: 13% vs 9%
- ROE: 17% vs 7%
- Operating Margin: 14% vs 26%
- Revenue (TTM): $11.0B vs $34.2B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $187.8B vs $339.1B
Size Category: Large Cap vs Mega Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 133.72 vs 103.93
- P/B Ratio: 19.56 vs 6.92
- EV/EBITDA: 79.35 vs 48.86
- Forward P/E: 55.25 vs 43.10
- PEG Ratio: 2.05 vs 1.99
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: TECHNOLOGY vs TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE vs SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- NOW Rating: Buy
- SAP Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- NOW Country: USA
- SAP Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NYQ vs NYQ
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- NOW Beta: 1.03 (Average)
- SAP Beta: 0.90 (Average)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
business similarity
Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.
This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.
A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- NOW Price vs 200-day MA: 99.91%
- SAP Price vs 200-day MA: 124.74%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Oracle Corporation
ORCL - NYQOracle is an American multinational computer technology corporation headquartered in Austin, Texas. The company was formerly headquartered in Redwood Shores, California until December 2020 when it moved its headquarters to Texas. The company sells database software and technology, cloud engineered systems, and enterprise software products, particularly its own brands of database management systems.
Oracle Corporation is a major player in cloud computing and enterprise software, making it a relevant comparable due to its services in managing business processes and workflows.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 27%
R-squared: 7%
This indicates a negligible relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 7
- NOW in ORCL's comparables: No
- ORCL in NOW's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 21% vs 9%
- Profit Margin: 13% vs 21%
- ROE: 17% vs 125%
- Operating Margin: 14% vs 31%
- Revenue (TTM): $11.0B vs $54.9B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $187.8B vs $464.5B
Size Category: Large Cap vs Mega Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 133.72 vs 40.60
- P/B Ratio: 19.56 vs 33.79
- EV/EBITDA: 79.35 vs 23.86
- Forward P/E: 55.25 vs 23.70
- PEG Ratio: 2.05 vs 1.81
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: TECHNOLOGY vs TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE vs SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- NOW Rating: Buy
- ORCL Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- NOW Country: USA
- ORCL Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NYQ vs NYQ
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- NOW Beta: 1.03 (Average)
- ORCL Beta: 1.05 (Average)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
business similarity
Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.
This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.
A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- NOW Price vs 200-day MA: 99.91%
- ORCL Price vs 200-day MA: 105.47%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
ADP - NMSAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) is an American provider of human resources management software and services.
ServiceNow provides cloud-based services that help organizations manage digital workflows, aligning with ADP's technology-driven HR solutions and enterprise services.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 24%
R-squared: 6%
This indicates a negligible relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 5
- ADP in NOW's comparables: Yes
- NOW in ADP's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 8% vs 21%
- Profit Margin: 20% vs 13%
- ROE: 84% vs 17%
- Operating Margin: 26% vs 14%
- Revenue (TTM): $19.9B vs $11.0B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $127.1B vs $187.8B
Size Category: Large Cap vs Large Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 32.57 vs 133.72
- P/B Ratio: 25.53 vs 19.56
- EV/EBITDA: 21.47 vs 79.35
- Forward P/E: 29.24 vs 55.25
- PEG Ratio: 3.40 vs 2.05
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: TECHNOLOGY vs TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: SERVICES-COMPUTER PROCESSING & DATA PREPARATION vs SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- ADP Rating: Hold
- NOW Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- ADP Country: USA
- NOW Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NMS vs NYQ
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- ADP Beta: 0.78 (Low)
- NOW Beta: 1.03 (Average)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
business similarity
Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.
This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.
A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- ADP Price vs 200-day MA: 112.15%
- NOW Price vs 200-day MA: 99.91%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Loading comparable stocks ...
Salesforce, Inc.
CRM - NYQSalesforce.com, Inc. is an American cloud-based software company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It provides customer relationship management (CRM) service and also provides a complementar...
Salesforce.com, Inc. is an American cloud-based software company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It provides customer relationship management (CRM) service and also provides a complementary suite of enterprise applications focused on customer service, marketing automation, analytics, and application development.
Microsoft Corporation
MSFT - NMSMicrosoft Corporation is an American multinational technology company which produces computer software, consumer electronics, personal computers, and related services. Its best known software products...
Microsoft Corporation is an American multinational technology company which produces computer software, consumer electronics, personal computers, and related services. Its best known software products are the Microsoft Windows line of operating systems, the Microsoft Office suite, and the Internet Explorer and Edge web browsers. Its flagship hardware products are the Xbox video game consoles and the Microsoft Surface lineup of touchscreen personal computers. Microsoft ranked No. 21 in the 2020 Fortune 500 rankings of the largest United States corporations by total revenue; it was the world's largest software maker by revenue as of 2016. It is considered one of the Big Five companies in the U.S. information technology industry, along with Google, Apple, Amazon, and Facebook.
SAP SE
SAP - NYQSAP SE is a global enterprise application software company. The company is headquartered in Walldorf, Germany.
SAP SE is a global enterprise application software company. The company is headquartered in Walldorf, Germany.
Oracle Corporation
ORCL - NYQOracle is an American multinational computer technology corporation headquartered in Austin, Texas. The company was formerly headquartered in Redwood Shores, California until December 2020 when it mov...
Oracle is an American multinational computer technology corporation headquartered in Austin, Texas. The company was formerly headquartered in Redwood Shores, California until December 2020 when it moved its headquarters to Texas. The company sells database software and technology, cloud engineered systems, and enterprise software products, particularly its own brands of database management systems.
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
ADP - NMSAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) is an American provider of human resources management software and services.
Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) is an American provider of human resources management software and services.