Find Comparable ETFs for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
IGV - BTSSPDR S&P Software & Services ETF
XSW - PCXThe iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF targets software and IT services, making it directly comparable to XSW, which focuses on software and services within the technology sector.
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 90%
R-squared: 80%
This indicates a strong positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 6
- IGV in XSW's comparables: Yes
- XSW in IGV's comparables: No
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- IGV Beta: 1.06 (Average)
- XSW Beta: 1.13 (Average)
- IGV 200-day Volatility: 20.84%
- XSW 200-day Volatility: 19.13%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- IGV Price vs 200-day MA: 105%
- XSW Price vs 200-day MA: 103%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | IGV | XSW |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 14% | 8% |
| Year_3 | 0% | -5% |
| Year_5 | 13% | 9% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: BTS vs PCX
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Technology Equities vs Technology Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- IGV Dividend Yield: 0%
- XSW Dividend Yield: 0%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
VGT - PCXAs a Vanguard ETF, VGT invests in technology and software companies, making it a direct competitor to IGV in terms of sector exposure.
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 85%
R-squared: 72%
This indicates a strong positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 3
- IGV in VGT's comparables: No
- VGT in IGV's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- IGV Beta: 1.06 (Average)
- VGT Beta: 1.16 (Average)
- IGV 200-day Volatility: 20.84%
- VGT 200-day Volatility: 21.58%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- IGV Price vs 200-day MA: 105%
- VGT Price vs 200-day MA: 101%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | IGV | VGT |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 14% | 22% |
| Year_3 | 0% | 10% |
| Year_5 | 13% | 21% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: BTS vs PCX
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Technology Equities vs Technology Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- IGV Dividend Yield: 0%
- VGT Dividend Yield: 0%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
FTEC - PCXThe iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF includes a range of technology-related companies, similar to FTEC, while providing more diversification within the tech space.
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 85%
R-squared: 72%
This indicates a strong positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 3
- FTEC in IGV's comparables: Yes
- IGV in FTEC's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- FTEC Beta: 1.16 (Average)
- IGV Beta: 1.06 (Average)
- FTEC 200-day Volatility: 21.92%
- IGV 200-day Volatility: 20.84%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- FTEC Price vs 200-day MA: 101%
- IGV Price vs 200-day MA: 105%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | FTEC | IGV |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 23% | 14% |
| Year_3 | 10% | 0% |
| Year_5 | 21% | 13% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: PCX vs BTS
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Technology Equities vs Technology Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- FTEC Dividend Yield: 0%
- IGV Dividend Yield: 0%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
IYW - PCXThe iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF emphasizes software and IT services, providing a specific subset of technology similar to IYW’s holdings.
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 85%
R-squared: 73%
This indicates a strong positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 4
- IGV in IYW's comparables: Yes
- IYW in IGV's comparables: No
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- IGV Beta: 1.06 (Average)
- IYW Beta: 1.15 (Average)
- IGV 200-day Volatility: 20.84%
- IYW 200-day Volatility: 22.14%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- IGV Price vs 200-day MA: 105%
- IYW Price vs 200-day MA: 101%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | IGV | IYW |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 14% | 26% |
| Year_3 | 0% | 11% |
| Year_5 | 13% | 22% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: BTS vs PCX
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Technology Equities vs Technology Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- IGV Dividend Yield: 0%
- IYW Dividend Yield: 0%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
The Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund
XLK - PCXThis ETF focuses on technology sector equities, similar to IGV, but with a broader approach that includes hardware and services alongside software.
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 84%
R-squared: 70%
This indicates a strong positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 3
- IGV in XLK's comparables: No
- XLK in IGV's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- IGV Beta: 1.06 (Average)
- XLK Beta: 1.14 (Average)
- IGV 200-day Volatility: 20.84%
- XLK 200-day Volatility: 22.59%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- IGV Price vs 200-day MA: 105%
- XLK Price vs 200-day MA: 100%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | IGV | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 14% | 19% |
| Year_3 | 0% | 11% |
| Year_5 | 13% | 22% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: BTS vs PCX
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Technology Equities vs Technology Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- IGV Dividend Yield: 0%
- XLK Dividend Yield: 1%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund
FDN - PCXThis ETF focuses on the software and technology sector, much like FDN, which is heavily weighted in internet-related companies.
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 92%
R-squared: 85%
This indicates a strong positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 2
- FDN in IGV's comparables: No
- IGV in FDN's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the assets are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 31.05 vs 48.06
A high score indicates that the market values these assets similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- FDN Beta: 1.12 (Average)
- IGV Beta: 1.06 (Average)
- FDN 200-day Volatility: 18.26%
- IGV 200-day Volatility: 20.84%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- FDN Price vs 200-day MA: 111%
- IGV Price vs 200-day MA: 105%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | FDN | IGV |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 14% | 14% |
| Year_3 | -8% | 0% |
| Year_5 | 5% | 13% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: PCX vs BTS
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Large Cap Growth Equities vs Technology Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- FDN Dividend Yield: 0%
- IGV Dividend Yield: 0%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
RYT - PCXRYT is a technology ETF that tracks the performance of software and tech stocks, similar to IGV's holdings and sector focus.
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 82%
R-squared: 68%
This indicates a strong positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 3
- IGV in RYT's comparables: Yes
- RYT in IGV's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- IGV Price vs 200-day MA: 105%
- RYT Price vs 200-day MA: 109%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | IGV | RYT |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 14% | 0% |
| Year_3 | 0% | 0% |
| Year_5 | 13% | 0% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: BTS vs PCX
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
SPY - PCX
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 83%
R-squared: 70%
This indicates a strong positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 1
- IGV in SPY's comparables: No
- SPY in IGV's comparables: No
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- IGV Beta: 1.06 (Average)
- SPY Beta: 1.00 (Average)
- IGV 200-day Volatility: 20.84%
- SPY 200-day Volatility: 11.69%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- IGV Price vs 200-day MA: 105%
- SPY Price vs 200-day MA: 104%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | IGV | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 14% | 20% |
| Year_3 | 0% | 8% |
| Year_5 | 13% | 14% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: BTS vs PCX
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Technology Equities vs Large Cap Growth Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- IGV Dividend Yield: 0%
- SPY Dividend Yield: 1%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
IGF - NGMThis ETF includes companies involved in infrastructure and software, providing a slightly different angle on tech investments, yet still comparable to IGV’s software focus.
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 28%
R-squared: 8%
This indicates a negligible relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 1
- IGF in IGV's comparables: Yes
- IGV in IGF's comparables: No
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- IGF Beta: 0.80 (Low)
- IGV Beta: 1.06 (Average)
- IGF 200-day Volatility: 11.66%
- IGV 200-day Volatility: 20.84%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- IGF Price vs 200-day MA: 101%
- IGV Price vs 200-day MA: 105%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | IGF | IGV |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 12% | 14% |
| Year_3 | 6% | 0% |
| Year_5 | 5% | 13% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NGM vs BTS
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Utilities Equities vs Technology Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- IGF Dividend Yield: 3%
- IGV Dividend Yield: 0%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Loading comparable ETFs ...