CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) - Tax Loss Harvesting Alternatives
Find the best tax-efficient alternatives for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD).
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. Overview
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.
Key Metrics
- Sector: TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE
- Exchange: NMS
- Market Cap: $90,011,893,760
Top Similar Stocks
TaxGhost finds the best tax loss harvesting alternatives for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. based on over 100 data points.
Find Comparable Stocks for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
CRWD - NMSCrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Zscaler, Inc.
ZS - NMSZscaler, Inc. is a global cloud security company. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.
Zscaler specializes in cloud security and provides solutions for secure internet access and private application access, aligning closely with CrowdStrike's focus on cloud workload protection.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 73%
R-squared: 54%
This indicates a strong positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 6
- CRWD in ZS's comparables: Yes
- ZS in CRWD's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 29% vs 26%
- Profit Margin: 3% vs -2%
- ROE: 5% vs -3%
- Operating Margin: -6% vs -5%
- Revenue (TTM): $3.7B vs $2.3B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $90.0B vs $30.1B
Size Category: Large Cap vs Large Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 716.55 vs 0.00
- P/B Ratio: 30.83 vs 20.28
- EV/EBITDA: 230.17 vs 293.91
- Forward P/E: 88.50 vs 66.67
- PEG Ratio: 1.72 vs 3.34
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: TECHNOLOGY vs TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE vs SERVICES-COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- CRWD Rating: Buy
- ZS Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- CRWD Country: USA
- ZS Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NMS vs NMS
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- CRWD Beta: 1.19 (Average)
- ZS Beta: 0.88 (Average)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
business similarity
Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.
This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.
A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- CRWD Price vs 200-day MA: 109.61%
- ZS Price vs 200-day MA: 104.25%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Fortinet, Inc.
FTNT - NMSFortinet (Nasdaq: FTNT) is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Sunnyvale, California. It develops and sells cybersecurity solutions, including but not limited to physical products such as firewalls, plus software and services such as anti-virus protection, intrusion prevention systems and endpoint security components.
Fortinet offers comprehensive cybersecurity solutions, including endpoint protection and network security, positioning it as a competitor in the growing cybersecurity market alongside CrowdStrike.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 50%
R-squared: 25%
This indicates a weak positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 4
- CRWD in FTNT's comparables: Yes
- FTNT in CRWD's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 29% vs 17%
- Profit Margin: 3% vs 29%
- ROE: 5% vs 34%
- Operating Margin: -6% vs 35%
- Revenue (TTM): $3.7B vs $6.0B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $90.0B vs $82.1B
Size Category: Large Cap vs Large Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 716.55 vs 47.26
- P/B Ratio: 30.83 vs 54.84
- EV/EBITDA: 230.17 vs 35.82
- Forward P/E: 88.50 vs 43.29
- PEG Ratio: 1.72 vs 3.07
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: TECHNOLOGY vs TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE vs COMPUTER PERIPHERAL EQUIPMENT, NEC
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- CRWD Rating: Buy
- FTNT Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- CRWD Country: USA
- FTNT Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NMS vs NMS
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- CRWD Beta: 1.19 (Average)
- FTNT Beta: 0.97 (Average)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
business similarity
Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.
This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.
A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- CRWD Price vs 200-day MA: 109.61%
- FTNT Price vs 200-day MA: 132.44%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
CyberArk Software Ltd.
CYBR - NMSCyberArk Software Ltd., develops, markets and sells software-based security solutions and services in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Petah Tikva, Israel.
CyberArk focuses on identity security and privileged access management, complementing the endpoint protection services provided by CrowdStrike in the cybersecurity industry.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 56%
R-squared: 31%
This indicates a moderate positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 7
- CRWD in CYBR's comparables: No
- CYBR in CRWD's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 29% vs 41%
- Profit Margin: 3% vs -9%
- ROE: 5% vs -6%
- Operating Margin: -6% vs -10%
- Revenue (TTM): $3.7B vs $1.0B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $90.0B vs $16.6B
Size Category: Large Cap vs Large Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 716.55 vs 0.00
- P/B Ratio: 30.83 vs 7.53
- EV/EBITDA: 230.17 vs 781.42
- Forward P/E: 88.50 vs 99.01
- PEG Ratio: 1.72 vs 4.94
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: TECHNOLOGY vs TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE vs SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- CRWD Rating: Buy
- CYBR Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- CRWD Country: USA
- CYBR Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NMS vs NMS
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- CRWD Beta: 1.19 (Average)
- CYBR Beta: 1.06 (Average)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
business similarity
Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.
This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.
A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- CRWD Price vs 200-day MA: 109.61%
- CYBR Price vs 200-day MA: 113.27%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
SentinelOne, Inc.
S - NYQSentinelOne, Inc. is a cybersecurity provider in the United States. The company is headquartered in Mountain View, California.
CrowdStrike is a direct competitor in the cybersecurity space, providing cloud-based endpoint protection similar to SentinelOne's offerings. Both companies focus on advanced threat detection and response solutions.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 59%
R-squared: 35%
This indicates a moderate positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 7
- CRWD in S's comparables: Yes
- S in CRWD's comparables: No
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 29% vs 28%
- Profit Margin: 3% vs -38%
- ROE: 5% vs -18%
- Operating Margin: -6% vs -42%
- Revenue (TTM): $3.7B vs $770.1M
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $90.0B vs $6.6B
Size Category: Large Cap vs Mid Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 716.55 vs 0.00
- P/B Ratio: 30.83 vs 4.04
- EV/EBITDA: 230.17 vs -10.97
- Forward P/E: 88.50 vs 126.58
- PEG Ratio: 1.72 vs 0.00
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: TECHNOLOGY vs TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE vs SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- CRWD Rating: Buy
- S Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- CRWD Country: USA
- S Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NMS vs NYQ
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- CRWD Beta: 1.19 (Average)
- S Beta: 0.75 (Low)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
business similarity
Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.
This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.
A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- CRWD Price vs 200-day MA: 109.61%
- S Price vs 200-day MA: 89.31%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Okta, Inc.
OKTA - NMSOkta provides identity management and security solutions, which are increasingly important for endpoint security, thus making it comparable to CrowdStrike in the cybersecurity space.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 38%
R-squared: 14%
This indicates a weak positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 4
- CRWD in OKTA's comparables: Yes
- OKTA in CRWD's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 29% vs 13%
- Profit Margin: 3% vs 1%
- ROE: 5% vs 0%
- Operating Margin: -6% vs 3%
- Revenue (TTM): $3.7B vs $2.6B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $90.0B vs $19.9B
Size Category: Large Cap vs Large Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 716.55 vs 1,938.50
- P/B Ratio: 30.83 vs 2.38
- EV/EBITDA: 230.17 vs 227.45
- Forward P/E: 88.50 vs 29.76
- PEG Ratio: 1.72 vs 1.19
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: TECHNOLOGY vs TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE vs SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- CRWD Rating: Buy
- OKTA Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- CRWD Country: USA
- OKTA Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NMS vs NMS
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- CRWD Beta: 1.19 (Average)
- OKTA Beta: 1.09 (Average)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- CRWD Price vs 200-day MA: 109.61%
- OKTA Price vs 200-day MA: 135.61%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Albemarle Corporation
ALB - NYQAlbemarle Corporation is a fine chemical manufacturing company based in Charlotte, North Carolina.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 11%
R-squared: 1%
This indicates a negligible relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 0
- ALB in CRWD's comparables: No
- CRWD in ALB's comparables: No
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: -48% vs 29%
- Profit Margin: -22% vs 3%
- ROE: -11% vs 5%
- Operating Margin: 2% vs -6%
- Revenue (TTM): $5.4B vs $3.7B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $8.7B vs $90.0B
Size Category: Mid Cap vs Large Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 0.00 vs 716.55
- P/B Ratio: 1.06 vs 30.83
- EV/EBITDA: 22.45 vs 230.17
- Forward P/E: 18.45 vs 88.50
- PEG Ratio: 0.99 vs 1.72
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: LIFE SCIENCES vs TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: PLASTIC MATERIALS, SYNTH RESINS & NONVULCAN ELASTOMERS vs SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- ALB Rating: Hold
- CRWD Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- ALB Country: USA
- CRWD Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NYQ vs NMS
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- ALB Beta: 1.70 (High)
- CRWD Beta: 1.19 (Average)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- ALB Price vs 200-day MA: 77.98%
- CRWD Price vs 200-day MA: 109.61%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Loading comparable stocks ...
Zscaler, Inc.
ZS - NMSZscaler, Inc. is a global cloud security company. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.
Zscaler, Inc. is a global cloud security company. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.
Fortinet, Inc.
FTNT - NMSFortinet (Nasdaq: FTNT) is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Sunnyvale, California. It develops and sells cybersecurity solutions, including but not limited to physical products s...
Fortinet (Nasdaq: FTNT) is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Sunnyvale, California. It develops and sells cybersecurity solutions, including but not limited to physical products such as firewalls, plus software and services such as anti-virus protection, intrusion prevention systems and endpoint security components.
CyberArk Software Ltd.
CYBR - NMSCyberArk Software Ltd., develops, markets and sells software-based security solutions and services in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and internationally. The company is headquarte...
CyberArk Software Ltd., develops, markets and sells software-based security solutions and services in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Petah Tikva, Israel.
SentinelOne, Inc.
S - NYQSentinelOne, Inc. is a cybersecurity provider in the United States. The company is headquartered in Mountain View, California.
SentinelOne, Inc. is a cybersecurity provider in the United States. The company is headquartered in Mountain View, California.
Okta, Inc.
OKTA - NMSAlbemarle Corporation
ALB - NYQAlbemarle Corporation is a fine chemical manufacturing company based in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Albemarle Corporation is a fine chemical manufacturing company based in Charlotte, North Carolina.