Find Comparable Stocks for AT&T Inc.
AT&T Inc.
T - NYQAT&T Inc. is an American multinational conglomerate holding company, Delaware-registered but headquartered at Whitacre Tower in Downtown Dallas, Texas. It is the world largest telecommunications company, and the second largest provider of mobile telephone services.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Verizon Communications Inc.
VZ - NYQVerizon Communications Inc. is an American multinational telecommunications conglomerate and a corporate component of the Dow Jones Industrial Average. The company is headquartered at 1095 Avenue of the Americas in Midtown Manhattan, New York City, but is incorporated in Delaware.
Verizon Communications Inc. is a major competitor in the telecommunications industry, providing similar services to AT&T, including wireless and broadband services, making it a direct peer for comparison.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 68%
R-squared: 46%
This indicates a moderate positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 6
- T in VZ's comparables: Yes
- VZ in T's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 1% vs 2%
- Profit Margin: 9% vs 13%
- ROE: 10% vs 19%
- Operating Margin: 18% vs 21%
- Revenue (TTM): $122.3B vs $134.8B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $196.8B vs $181.4B
Size Category: Large Cap vs Large Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 18.40 vs 10.41
- P/B Ratio: 1.89 vs 1.83
- EV/EBITDA: 7.59 vs 7.27
- Forward P/E: 13.53 vs 9.23
- PEG Ratio: 4.67 vs 2.87
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: TECHNOLOGY vs TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS (NO RADIOTELEPHONE) vs TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS (NO RADIOTELEPHONE)
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- T Rating: Buy
- VZ Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- T Country: USA
- VZ Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NYQ vs NYQ
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- T Beta: 0.73 (Low)
- VZ Beta: 0.44 (Low)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
business similarity
Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.
This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.
A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- T Price vs 200-day MA: 129.11%
- VZ Price vs 200-day MA: 104.16%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- T Dividend Yield: 4%
- VZ Dividend Yield: 6%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
BCE Inc.
BCE - NYQBCE Inc., a telecommunications and media company, provides wireless, wireline, Internet and television (TV) services to residential, commercial and wholesale customers in Canada. The company is headquartered in Verdun, Canada.
AT&T Inc. is a prominent player in the telecommunications industry in the U.S., similar to BCE in terms of service offerings and market presence, providing a relevant comparison.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 37%
R-squared: 14%
This indicates a weak positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 5
- BCE in T's comparables: No
- T in BCE's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: -1% vs 1%
- Profit Margin: 1% vs 9%
- ROE: 2% vs 10%
- Operating Margin: 21% vs 18%
- Revenue (TTM): $24.4B vs $122.3B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $22.3B vs $196.8B
Size Category: Large Cap vs Large Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 408.17 vs 18.40
- P/B Ratio: 2.20 vs 1.89
- EV/EBITDA: 9.40 vs 7.59
- Forward P/E: 12.35 vs 13.53
- PEG Ratio: 0.20 vs 4.67
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: TECHNOLOGY vs TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS (NO RADIOTELEPHONE) vs TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS (NO RADIOTELEPHONE)
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- BCE Rating: Hold
- T Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- BCE Country: USA
- T Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NYQ vs NYQ
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- BCE Beta: 0.43 (Low)
- T Beta: 0.73 (Low)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
business similarity
Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.
This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.
A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- BCE Price vs 200-day MA: 81.39%
- T Price vs 200-day MA: 129.11%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- BCE Dividend Yield: 12%
- T Dividend Yield: 4%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
T-Mobile US, Inc.
TMUS - NMST-Mobile US, Inc., doing business under the global brand name T-Mobile, is an American wireless network operator. Its headquarters are located in Bellevue, Washington, in the Seattle metropolitan area and Overland Park, Kansas, in the Kansas City metropolitan area.
T-Mobile US Inc. operates in the same sector as AT&T, focusing on mobile communications and services, which makes it an appropriate comparable stock in terms of market positioning and service offerings.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 29%
R-squared: 9%
This indicates a negligible relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 6
- T in TMUS's comparables: Yes
- TMUS in T's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 1% vs 7%
- Profit Margin: 9% vs 14%
- ROE: 10% vs 18%
- Operating Margin: 18% vs 20%
- Revenue (TTM): $122.3B vs $81.4B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $196.8B vs $307.9B
Size Category: Large Cap vs Mega Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 18.40 vs 27.95
- P/B Ratio: 1.89 vs 4.99
- EV/EBITDA: 7.59 vs 13.43
- Forward P/E: 13.53 vs 25.00
- PEG Ratio: 4.67 vs 1.48
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: TECHNOLOGY vs TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS (NO RADIOTELEPHONE) vs RADIOTELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- T Rating: Buy
- TMUS Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- T Country: USA
- TMUS Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NYQ vs NMS
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- T Beta: 0.73 (Low)
- TMUS Beta: 0.56 (Low)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
business similarity
Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.
This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.
A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- T Price vs 200-day MA: 129.11%
- TMUS Price vs 200-day MA: 129.06%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- T Dividend Yield: 4%
- TMUS Dividend Yield: 1%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Deutsche Telekom AG
DTEGY - OQXAT&T Inc. is another major player in telecommunications with a significant market cap and diversified service offerings, making it a relevant comparison to DTEGY.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 14%
R-squared: 2%
This indicates a negligible relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 4
- DTEGY in T's comparables: No
- T in DTEGY's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 0% vs 1%
- Profit Margin: 0% vs 9%
- ROE: 0% vs 10%
- Operating Margin: 0% vs 18%
- Revenue (TTM): $0 vs $122.3B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $180.9B vs $196.8B
Size Category: Large Cap vs Large Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 15.32 vs 18.40
- P/B Ratio: 0.00 vs 1.89
- EV/EBITDA: 0.00 vs 7.59
- Forward P/E: 0.00 vs 13.53
- PEG Ratio: 0.00 vs 4.67
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: vs TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: vs TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS (NO RADIOTELEPHONE)
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- DTEGY Country:
- T Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: OQX vs NYQ
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- DTEGY Price vs 200-day MA: 126.70%
- T Price vs 200-day MA: 129.11%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
International Business Machines Corporation
IBM - NYQInternational Business Machines Corporation (IBM) is an American multinational technology company headquartered in Armonk, New York, with operations in over 170 countries. The company began in 1911, founded in Endicott, New York, as the Computing-Tabulating-Recording Company (CTR) and was renamed International Business Machines in 1924. IBM is incorporated in New York. IBM produces and sells computer hardware, middleware and software, and provides hosting and consulting services in areas ranging from mainframe computers to nanotechnology. IBM is also a major research organization, holding the record for most annual U.S. patents generated by a business (as of 2020) for 28 consecutive years. Inventions by IBM include the automated teller machine (ATM), the floppy disk, the hard disk drive, the magnetic stripe card, the relational database, the SQL programming language, the UPC barcode, and dynamic random-access memory (DRAM). The IBM mainframe, exemplified by the System/360, was the dominant computing platform during the 1960s and 1970s.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 14%
R-squared: 2%
This indicates a negligible relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 1
- IBM in T's comparables: No
- T in IBM's comparables: No
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 1% vs 1%
- Profit Margin: 10% vs 9%
- ROE: 24% vs 10%
- Operating Margin: 20% vs 18%
- Revenue (TTM): $62.8B vs $122.3B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $233.1B vs $196.8B
Size Category: Mega Cap vs Large Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 39.09 vs 18.40
- P/B Ratio: 8.50 vs 1.89
- EV/EBITDA: 22.65 vs 7.59
- Forward P/E: 22.99 vs 13.53
- PEG Ratio: 1.71 vs 4.67
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: TECHNOLOGY vs TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: COMPUTER & OFFICE EQUIPMENT vs TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS (NO RADIOTELEPHONE)
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- IBM Rating: Hold
- T Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- IBM Country: USA
- T Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NYQ vs NYQ
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- IBM Beta: 0.73 (Low)
- T Beta: 0.73 (Low)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
business similarity
Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.
This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.
A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- IBM Price vs 200-day MA: 119.67%
- T Price vs 200-day MA: 129.11%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- IBM Dividend Yield: 3%
- T Dividend Yield: 4%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Select Mutual Comparables:
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
The Procter & Gamble Company
PG - NYQThe Procter & Gamble Company (P&G) is an American multinational consumer goods corporation headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, founded in 1837 by William Procter and James Gamble. It specializes in a wide range of personal health, consumer health, personal care, and hygiene products; these products are organized into several segments including Beauty; Grooming; Health Care; Fabric & Home Care; and Baby, Feminine, & Family Care. Before the sale of Pringles to Kellogg's, its product portfolio also included food, snacks, and beverages.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 22%
R-squared: 5%
This indicates a negligible relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 0
- PG in T's comparables: No
- T in PG's comparables: No
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 2% vs 1%
- Profit Margin: 18% vs 9%
- ROE: 31% vs 10%
- Operating Margin: 27% vs 18%
- Revenue (TTM): $84.3B vs $122.3B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $410.9B vs $196.8B
Size Category: Mega Cap vs Large Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 27.86 vs 18.40
- P/B Ratio: 8.17 vs 1.89
- EV/EBITDA: 18.77 vs 7.59
- Forward P/E: 23.81 vs 13.53
- PEG Ratio: 3.50 vs 4.67
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: LIFE SCIENCES vs TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: SOAP, DETERGENTS, CLEANG PREPARATIONS, PERFUMES, COSMETICS vs TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS (NO RADIOTELEPHONE)
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- PG Rating: Buy
- T Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- PG Country: USA
- T Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NYQ vs NYQ
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- PG Beta: 0.40 (Low)
- T Beta: 0.73 (Low)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
business similarity
Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.
This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.
A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- PG Price vs 200-day MA: 103.84%
- T Price vs 200-day MA: 129.11%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- PG Dividend Yield: 2%
- T Dividend Yield: 4%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Carrier Global Corporation
CARR - NYQCarrier Global Corporation is an American multinational home appliances corporation based in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 11%
R-squared: 1%
This indicates a negligible relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 19% vs 1%
- Profit Margin: 25% vs 9%
- ROE: 10% vs 10%
- Operating Margin: 7% vs 18%
- Revenue (TTM): $22.5B vs $122.3B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $56.6B vs $196.8B
Size Category: Large Cap vs Large Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 53.68 vs 18.40
- P/B Ratio: 3.88 vs 1.89
- EV/EBITDA: 15.52 vs 7.59
- Forward P/E: 21.10 vs 13.53
- PEG Ratio: 422.01 vs 4.67
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: TECHNOLOGY vs TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: AIR-COND & WARM AIR HEATG EQUIP & COMM & INDL REFRIG EQUIP vs TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS (NO RADIOTELEPHONE)
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- CARR Rating: Hold
- T Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- CARR Country: USA
- T Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NYQ vs NYQ
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- CARR Beta: 1.23 (Average)
- T Beta: 0.73 (Low)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
business similarity
Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.
This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.
A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- CARR Price vs 200-day MA: 93.58%
- T Price vs 200-day MA: 129.11%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- CARR Dividend Yield: 1%
- T Dividend Yield: 4%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Loading comparable stocks ...
Verizon Communications Inc.
VZ - NYQVerizon Communications Inc. is an American multinational telecommunications conglomerate and a corporate component of the Dow Jones Industrial Average. The company is headquartered at 1095 Avenue of t...
Verizon Communications Inc. is an American multinational telecommunications conglomerate and a corporate component of the Dow Jones Industrial Average. The company is headquartered at 1095 Avenue of the Americas in Midtown Manhattan, New York City, but is incorporated in Delaware.
BCE Inc.
BCE - NYQBCE Inc., a telecommunications and media company, provides wireless, wireline, Internet and television (TV) services to residential, commercial and wholesale customers in Canada. The company is headqu...
BCE Inc., a telecommunications and media company, provides wireless, wireline, Internet and television (TV) services to residential, commercial and wholesale customers in Canada. The company is headquartered in Verdun, Canada.
T-Mobile US, Inc.
TMUS - NMST-Mobile US, Inc., doing business under the global brand name T-Mobile, is an American wireless network operator. Its headquarters are located in Bellevue, Washington, in the Seattle metropolitan area...
T-Mobile US, Inc., doing business under the global brand name T-Mobile, is an American wireless network operator. Its headquarters are located in Bellevue, Washington, in the Seattle metropolitan area and Overland Park, Kansas, in the Kansas City metropolitan area.
Deutsche Telekom AG
DTEGY - OQXInternational Business Machines Corporation
IBM - NYQInternational Business Machines Corporation (IBM) is an American multinational technology company headquartered in Armonk, New York, with operations in over 170 countries. The company began in 1911, f...
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) is an American multinational technology company headquartered in Armonk, New York, with operations in over 170 countries. The company began in 1911, founded in Endicott, New York, as the Computing-Tabulating-Recording Company (CTR) and was renamed International Business Machines in 1924. IBM is incorporated in New York. IBM produces and sells computer hardware, middleware and software, and provides hosting and consulting services in areas ranging from mainframe computers to nanotechnology. IBM is also a major research organization, holding the record for most annual U.S. patents generated by a business (as of 2020) for 28 consecutive years. Inventions by IBM include the automated teller machine (ATM), the floppy disk, the hard disk drive, the magnetic stripe card, the relational database, the SQL programming language, the UPC barcode, and dynamic random-access memory (DRAM). The IBM mainframe, exemplified by the System/360, was the dominant computing platform during the 1960s and 1970s.
The Procter & Gamble Company
PG - NYQThe Procter & Gamble Company (P&G) is an American multinational consumer goods corporation headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, founded in 1837 by William Procter and James Gamble. It specializes in a w...
The Procter & Gamble Company (P&G) is an American multinational consumer goods corporation headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, founded in 1837 by William Procter and James Gamble. It specializes in a wide range of personal health, consumer health, personal care, and hygiene products; these products are organized into several segments including Beauty; Grooming; Health Care; Fabric & Home Care; and Baby, Feminine, & Family Care. Before the sale of Pringles to Kellogg's, its product portfolio also included food, snacks, and beverages.
Carrier Global Corporation
CARR - NYQCarrier Global Corporation is an American multinational home appliances corporation based in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida.
Carrier Global Corporation is an American multinational home appliances corporation based in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida.