Find Comparable Stocks for SentinelOne, Inc.
SentinelOne, Inc.
S - NYQSentinelOne, Inc. is a cybersecurity provider in the United States. The company is headquartered in Mountain View, California.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Zscaler, Inc.
ZS - NMSZscaler, Inc. is a global cloud security company. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.
Zscaler specializes in secure access to applications and data, emphasizing cloud security, which aligns with SentinelOne's focus on cybersecurity. Both companies operate in the same technological landscape.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 60%
R-squared: 35%
This indicates a moderate positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 6
- S in ZS's comparables: No
- ZS in S's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 28% vs 26%
- Profit Margin: -38% vs -2%
- ROE: -18% vs -3%
- Operating Margin: -42% vs -5%
- Revenue (TTM): $770.1M vs $2.3B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $6.6B vs $30.1B
Size Category: Mid Cap vs Large Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 0.00 vs 0.00
- P/B Ratio: 4.04 vs 20.28
- EV/EBITDA: -10.97 vs 293.91
- Forward P/E: 126.58 vs 66.67
- PEG Ratio: 0.00 vs 3.34
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: TECHNOLOGY vs TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE vs SERVICES-COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- S Rating: Buy
- ZS Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- S Country: USA
- ZS Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NYQ vs NMS
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- S Beta: 0.75 (Low)
- ZS Beta: 0.88 (Average)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
business similarity
Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.
This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.
A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- S Price vs 200-day MA: 89.31%
- ZS Price vs 200-day MA: 104.25%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
CRWD - NMSCrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.
CrowdStrike is a direct competitor in the cybersecurity space, providing cloud-based endpoint protection similar to SentinelOne's offerings. Both companies focus on advanced threat detection and response solutions.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 59%
R-squared: 35%
This indicates a moderate positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 7
- CRWD in S's comparables: Yes
- S in CRWD's comparables: No
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 29% vs 28%
- Profit Margin: 3% vs -38%
- ROE: 5% vs -18%
- Operating Margin: -6% vs -42%
- Revenue (TTM): $3.7B vs $770.1M
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $90.0B vs $6.6B
Size Category: Large Cap vs Mid Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 716.55 vs 0.00
- P/B Ratio: 30.83 vs 4.04
- EV/EBITDA: 230.17 vs -10.97
- Forward P/E: 88.50 vs 126.58
- PEG Ratio: 1.72 vs 0.00
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: TECHNOLOGY vs TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE vs SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- CRWD Rating: Buy
- S Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- CRWD Country: USA
- S Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NMS vs NYQ
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- CRWD Beta: 1.19 (Average)
- S Beta: 0.75 (Low)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
business similarity
Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.
This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.
A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- CRWD Price vs 200-day MA: 109.61%
- S Price vs 200-day MA: 89.31%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
NetScout Systems, Inc.
NTCT - NMSNetScout Systems, Inc. provides service security and cybersecurity solutions to protect digital business services from disruption in the United States, Europe, Asia Pacific, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Westford, Massachusetts.
NETSCOUT provides cybersecurity and performance monitoring solutions, which positions it similarly to SentinelOne in the technology sector, particularly within network security.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 33%
R-squared: 11%
This indicates a weak positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 7
- NTCT in S's comparables: Yes
- S in NTCT's comparables: No
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 16% vs 28%
- Profit Margin: -51% vs -38%
- ROE: -24% vs -18%
- Operating Margin: 25% vs -42%
- Revenue (TTM): $821.1M vs $770.1M
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $1.5B vs $6.6B
Size Category: Small Cap vs Mid Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 0.00 vs 0.00
- P/B Ratio: 1.02 vs 4.04
- EV/EBITDA: 18.64 vs -10.97
- Forward P/E: 9.87 vs 126.58
- PEG Ratio: 1.57 vs 0.00
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: TECHNOLOGY vs TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: SERVICES-COMPUTER INTEGRATED SYSTEMS DESIGN vs SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- NTCT Rating: Hold
- S Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- NTCT Country: USA
- S Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NMS vs NYQ
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- NTCT Beta: 0.64 (Low)
- S Beta: 0.75 (Low)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
business similarity
Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.
This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.
A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- NTCT Price vs 200-day MA: 102.76%
- S Price vs 200-day MA: 89.31%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Fortinet, Inc.
FTNT - NMSFortinet (Nasdaq: FTNT) is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Sunnyvale, California. It develops and sells cybersecurity solutions, including but not limited to physical products such as firewalls, plus software and services such as anti-virus protection, intrusion prevention systems and endpoint security components.
Fortinet offers a range of cybersecurity solutions, including firewalls and endpoint protection, making it a relevant comparison for SentinelOne in the cybersecurity industry.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 33%
R-squared: 11%
This indicates a weak positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 6
- FTNT in S's comparables: Yes
- S in FTNT's comparables: No
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 17% vs 28%
- Profit Margin: 29% vs -38%
- ROE: 34% vs -18%
- Operating Margin: 35% vs -42%
- Revenue (TTM): $6.0B vs $770.1M
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $82.1B vs $6.6B
Size Category: Large Cap vs Mid Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 47.26 vs 0.00
- P/B Ratio: 54.84 vs 4.04
- EV/EBITDA: 35.82 vs -10.97
- Forward P/E: 43.29 vs 126.58
- PEG Ratio: 3.07 vs 0.00
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: TECHNOLOGY vs TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: COMPUTER PERIPHERAL EQUIPMENT, NEC vs SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- FTNT Rating: Buy
- S Rating: Buy
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- FTNT Country: USA
- S Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NMS vs NYQ
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- FTNT Beta: 0.97 (Average)
- S Beta: 0.75 (Low)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
business similarity
Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.
This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.
A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- FTNT Price vs 200-day MA: 132.44%
- S Price vs 200-day MA: 89.31%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Loading comparable stocks ...
Zscaler, Inc.
ZS - NMSZscaler, Inc. is a global cloud security company. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.
Zscaler, Inc. is a global cloud security company. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
CRWD - NMSCrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is...
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.
NetScout Systems, Inc.
NTCT - NMSNetScout Systems, Inc. provides service security and cybersecurity solutions to protect digital business services from disruption in the United States, Europe, Asia Pacific, and internationally. The c...
NetScout Systems, Inc. provides service security and cybersecurity solutions to protect digital business services from disruption in the United States, Europe, Asia Pacific, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Westford, Massachusetts.
Fortinet, Inc.
FTNT - NMSFortinet (Nasdaq: FTNT) is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Sunnyvale, California. It develops and sells cybersecurity solutions, including but not limited to physical products s...
Fortinet (Nasdaq: FTNT) is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Sunnyvale, California. It develops and sells cybersecurity solutions, including but not limited to physical products such as firewalls, plus software and services such as anti-virus protection, intrusion prevention systems and endpoint security components.