Find Comparable Stocks for Zoom Communications Inc.
Zoom Communications Inc.
ZM - NMSZoom Video Communications, Inc. provides a premier video communications platform in the Americas, Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Atlassian Corporation
TEAM - NMSAtlassian Corporation Plc designs, develops, licenses and maintains various software products worldwide. The company is headquartered in Sydney, Australia.
Zoom Video Communications operates in the software sector and provides communication solutions, similar to Atlassian's collaborative software offerings.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 28%
R-squared: 8%
This indicates a negligible relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 4
- TEAM in ZM's comparables: Yes
- ZM in TEAM's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 21% vs 3%
- Profit Margin: -7% vs 22%
- ROE: -33% vs 12%
- Operating Margin: -4% vs 19%
- Revenue (TTM): $4.8B vs $4.7B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $72.5B vs $22.6B
Size Category: Large Cap vs Large Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 0.00 vs 22.96
- P/B Ratio: 58.91 vs 2.52
- EV/EBITDA: 6,069.18 vs 15.78
- Forward P/E: 63.29 vs 13.53
- PEG Ratio: 3.16 vs 2.72
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: TECHNOLOGY vs TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE vs SERVICES-COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, DATA PROCESSING, ETC.
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- TEAM Rating: Buy
- ZM Rating: Hold
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- TEAM Country: USA
- ZM Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NMS vs NMS
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- TEAM Beta: 0.91 (Average)
- ZM Beta: -0.01 (No Correlation)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
business similarity
Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.
This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.
A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- TEAM Price vs 200-day MA: 132.29%
- ZM Price vs 200-day MA: 103.45%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
DocuSign, Inc.
DOCU - NMSDocuSign, Inc. provides cloud-based software in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in San Francisco, California.
DocuSign operates in the digital transaction management space, complementing Zoom's services by enabling seamless document signing and workflow processes for remote interactions.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 45%
R-squared: 20%
This indicates a weak positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 3
- DOCU in ZM's comparables: Yes
- ZM in DOCU's comparables: No
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 8% vs 3%
- Profit Margin: 35% vs 22%
- ROE: 69% vs 12%
- Operating Margin: 8% vs 19%
- Revenue (TTM): $2.9B vs $4.7B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $16.6B vs $22.6B
Size Category: Large Cap vs Large Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 17.09 vs 22.96
- P/B Ratio: 8.30 vs 2.52
- EV/EBITDA: 49.75 vs 15.78
- Forward P/E: 21.64 vs 13.53
- PEG Ratio: 0.50 vs 2.72
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: TECHNOLOGY vs TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE vs SERVICES-COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, DATA PROCESSING, ETC.
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- DOCU Rating: Hold
- ZM Rating: Hold
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- DOCU Country: USA
- ZM Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NMS vs NMS
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- DOCU Beta: 1.02 (Average)
- ZM Beta: -0.01 (No Correlation)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
business similarity
Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.
This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.
A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- DOCU Price vs 200-day MA: 117.16%
- ZM Price vs 200-day MA: 103.45%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Okta, Inc.
OKTA - NMSOkta specializes in identity and access management, which is essential for secure online collaboration, making it relevant to Zoom's user base in the technology sector.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 42%
R-squared: 18%
This indicates a weak positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 1
- OKTA in ZM's comparables: Yes
- ZM in OKTA's comparables: No
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 13% vs 3%
- Profit Margin: 1% vs 22%
- ROE: 0% vs 12%
- Operating Margin: 3% vs 19%
- Revenue (TTM): $2.6B vs $4.7B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $19.9B vs $22.6B
Size Category: Large Cap vs Large Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 1,938.50 vs 22.96
- P/B Ratio: 2.38 vs 2.52
- EV/EBITDA: 227.45 vs 15.78
- Forward P/E: 29.76 vs 13.53
- PEG Ratio: 1.19 vs 2.72
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: TECHNOLOGY vs TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE vs SERVICES-COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, DATA PROCESSING, ETC.
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- OKTA Rating: Buy
- ZM Rating: Hold
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- OKTA Country: USA
- ZM Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NMS vs NMS
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- OKTA Beta: 1.09 (Average)
- ZM Beta: -0.01 (No Correlation)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- OKTA Price vs 200-day MA: 135.61%
- ZM Price vs 200-day MA: 103.45%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
Select Mutual Comparables:
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Shopify Inc.
SHOP - NYQShopify Inc., a commerce company, offers a commerce and service platform in Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Latin America, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Ottawa, Canada.
Shopify provides e-commerce solutions and relies on digital communication tools, paralleling Zoom's emphasis on facilitating online business interactions.
correlation
Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 41%
R-squared: 17%
This indicates a weak positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 2
- SHOP in ZM's comparables: Yes
- ZM in SHOP's comparables: No
A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
financials
Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.
- Revenue Growth: 21% vs 3%
- Profit Margin: 16% vs 22%
- ROE: 15% vs 12%
- Operating Margin: 14% vs 19%
- Revenue (TTM): $7.8B vs $4.7B
A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.
size
Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.
Market Cap: $137.3B vs $22.6B
Size Category: Large Cap vs Large Cap
A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 68.48 vs 22.96
- P/B Ratio: 11.94 vs 2.52
- EV/EBITDA: 120.80 vs 15.78
- Forward P/E: 70.42 vs 13.53
- PEG Ratio: 1.12 vs 2.72
A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
sector
Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.
- Sector: TECHNOLOGY vs TECHNOLOGY
- Industry: SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE vs SERVICES-COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, DATA PROCESSING, ETC.
A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.
analyst ratings
Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.
- SHOP Rating: Buy
- ZM Rating: Hold
A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.
- SHOP Country: USA
- ZM Country: USA
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NYQ vs NMS
A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- SHOP Beta: 2.37 (Very High)
- ZM Beta: -0.01 (No Correlation)
A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
business similarity
Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.
This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.
A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- SHOP Price vs 200-day MA: 123.39%
- ZM Price vs 200-day MA: 103.45%
A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
Income Statement
Financial Ratios
Growth
Loading comparable stocks ...
Atlassian Corporation
TEAM - NMSAtlassian Corporation Plc designs, develops, licenses and maintains various software products worldwide. The company is headquartered in Sydney, Australia.
Atlassian Corporation Plc designs, develops, licenses and maintains various software products worldwide. The company is headquartered in Sydney, Australia.
DocuSign, Inc.
DOCU - NMSDocuSign, Inc. provides cloud-based software in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in San Francisco, California.
DocuSign, Inc. provides cloud-based software in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in San Francisco, California.
Okta, Inc.
OKTA - NMSShopify Inc.
SHOP - NYQShopify Inc., a commerce company, offers a commerce and service platform in Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Latin America, and internationally. The company is headquartered i...
Shopify Inc., a commerce company, offers a commerce and service platform in Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Latin America, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Ottawa, Canada.