correlation

Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.

Pearson Correlation: 73%

R-squared: 54%

This indicates a strong positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.

network

Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.

• Common comparables: 6
• CRWD in ZS's comparables: Yes
• ZS in CRWD's comparables: Yes

A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.

financials

Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.

• Revenue Growth: 29% vs 26%
• Profit Margin: 3% vs -2%
• ROE: 5% vs -3%
• Operating Margin: -6% vs -5%
• Revenue (TTM): $3.7B vs $2.3B

A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.

size

Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.

Market Cap: $90.0B vs $30.1B

Size Category: Large Cap vs Large Cap

A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.

valuation

Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.

• P/E Ratio: 716.55 vs 0.00
• P/B Ratio: 30.83 vs 20.28
• EV/EBITDA: 230.17 vs 293.91
• Forward P/E: 88.50 vs 66.67
• PEG Ratio: 1.72 vs 3.34

A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.

sector

Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.

• Sector: TECHNOLOGY vs TECHNOLOGY
• Industry: SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE vs SERVICES-COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES

A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.

analyst ratings

Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.

• CRWD Rating: Buy
• ZS Rating: Buy

A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.

geo

Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.

• CRWD Country: USA
• ZS Country: USA
• Currency: USD vs USD
• Exchange: NMS vs NMS

A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.

volatility

Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.

• CRWD Beta: 1.19 (Average)
• ZS Beta: 0.88 (Average)

A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.

business similarity

Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.

This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.

A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.

momentum

Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.

• CRWD Price vs 200-day MA: 109.61%
• ZS Price vs 200-day MA: 104.25%

A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.

correlation

Measures how closely the two stocks' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.

Pearson Correlation: 60%

R-squared: 35%

This indicates a moderate positive relationship between the price movements of these stocks.

network

Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.

• Common comparables: 6
• S in ZS's comparables: No
• ZS in S's comparables: Yes

A high score suggests the companies are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.

financials

Compares key financial metrics to assess operational similarity and financial health.

• Revenue Growth: 28% vs 26%
• Profit Margin: -38% vs -2%
• ROE: -18% vs -3%
• Operating Margin: -42% vs -5%
• Revenue (TTM): $770.1M vs $2.3B

A high score indicates similar financial performance, efficiency, and growth trajectories, suggesting comparable business models and market positions.

size

Evaluates similarity in market capitalization, which can indicate comparable market influence, investor interest, and resource availability.

Market Cap: $6.6B vs $30.1B

Size Category: Mid Cap vs Large Cap

A high score suggests the companies are in the same size category, facing similar challenges and opportunities in terms of market presence and financial flexibility.

valuation

Compares valuation metrics to assess if the stocks are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.

• P/E Ratio: 0.00 vs 0.00
• P/B Ratio: 4.04 vs 20.28
• EV/EBITDA: -10.97 vs 293.91
• Forward P/E: 126.58 vs 66.67
• PEG Ratio: 0.00 vs 3.34

A high score indicates that the market values these companies similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.

sector

Compares the sector and industry classification of both companies, allowing for partial matches.

• Sector: TECHNOLOGY vs TECHNOLOGY
• Industry: SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE vs SERVICES-COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES

A high score indicates that the companies operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends. Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons.

analyst ratings

Compares the consensus of analyst opinions on both stocks.

• S Rating: Buy
• ZS Rating: Buy

A high score suggests that analysts view both stocks similarly in terms of their future prospects and investment potential.

geo

Evaluates the geographical similarity of the companies based on country, currency, exchange, and address.

• S Country: USA
• ZS Country: USA
• Currency: USD vs USD
• Exchange: NYQ vs NMS

A high score indicates that both companies operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.

volatility

Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.

• S Beta: 0.75 (Low)
• ZS Beta: 0.88 (Average)

A high score suggests both stocks have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.

business similarity

Assesses the similarity of the companies' business models, products, and services.

This score is based on an analysis of the companies' business descriptions, major products, and revenue streams.

A high score indicates that the companies have similar core businesses, target markets, and revenue generation strategies.

momentum

Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.

• S Price vs 200-day MA: 89.31%
• ZS Price vs 200-day MA: 104.25%

A high score indicates both stocks are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.