Find Comparable ETFs for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
IGF - NGMSPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF
GII - PCXThe iShares Global Infrastructure ETF focuses on companies involved in infrastructure development and management, similar to GII's focus on global infrastructure equities.
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 95%
R-squared: 90%
This indicates a strong positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 6
- GII in IGF's comparables: Yes
- IGF in GII's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the assets are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 16.28 vs 21.48
A high score indicates that the market values these assets similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- GII Beta: 0.81 (Low)
- IGF Beta: 0.80 (Low)
- GII 200-day Volatility: 11.67%
- IGF 200-day Volatility: 11.66%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- GII Price vs 200-day MA: 102%
- IGF Price vs 200-day MA: 101%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | GII | IGF |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 12% | 12% |
| Year_3 | 6% | 6% |
| Year_5 | 5% | 5% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: PCX vs NGM
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Utilities Equities vs Utilities Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- GII Dividend Yield: 3%
- IGF Dividend Yield: 3%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF
IFRA - BTSThe InfraCap MLP ETF focuses on master limited partnerships in the infrastructure sector, capturing similar investment themes as IGF with a focus on yield.
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 72%
R-squared: 51%
This indicates a strong positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 3
- IFRA in IGF's comparables: Yes
- IGF in IFRA's comparables: No
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the assets are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 13.29 vs 21.48
A high score indicates that the market values these assets similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- IFRA Beta: 1.03 (Average)
- IGF Beta: 0.80 (Low)
- IFRA 200-day Volatility: 14.76%
- IGF 200-day Volatility: 11.66%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- IFRA Price vs 200-day MA: 99%
- IGF Price vs 200-day MA: 101%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | IFRA | IGF |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 15% | 12% |
| Year_3 | 10% | 6% |
| Year_5 | 13% | 5% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: BTS vs NGM
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Utilities Equities vs Utilities Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- IFRA Dividend Yield: 2%
- IGF Dividend Yield: 3%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF
PAVE - BTSThe Global X Infrastructure Development ETF targets companies involved in infrastructure development, which aligns with the themes of growth and stability found in IGF.
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 53%
R-squared: 28%
This indicates a moderate positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 1
- IGF in PAVE's comparables: No
- PAVE in IGF's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the assets are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 21.48 vs 15.49
A high score indicates that the market values these assets similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- IGF Beta: 0.80 (Low)
- PAVE Beta: 1.27 (High)
- IGF 200-day Volatility: 11.66%
- PAVE 200-day Volatility: 18.88%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- IGF Price vs 200-day MA: 101%
- PAVE Price vs 200-day MA: 97%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | IGF | PAVE |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 12% | 17% |
| Year_3 | 6% | 13% |
| Year_5 | 5% | 20% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NGM vs BTS
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Utilities Equities vs Utilities Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- IGF Dividend Yield: 3%
- PAVE Dividend Yield: 1%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF
SUSA - PCXThe MSCI USA ESG Select ETF invests in U.S. companies with strong environmental, social, and governance practices, including infrastructure firms, providing a sustainable angle to infrastructure investments.
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 52%
R-squared: 27%
This indicates a moderate positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 1
- IGF in SUSA's comparables: No
- SUSA in IGF's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the assets are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 21.48 vs 21.87
A high score indicates that the market values these assets similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- IGF Beta: 0.80 (Low)
- SUSA Beta: 1.02 (Average)
- IGF 200-day Volatility: 11.66%
- SUSA 200-day Volatility: 11.95%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- IGF Price vs 200-day MA: 101%
- SUSA Price vs 200-day MA: 103%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | IGF | SUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 12% | 19% |
| Year_3 | 6% | 6% |
| Year_5 | 5% | 14% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NGM vs PCX
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Utilities Equities vs Large Cap Growth Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- IGF Dividend Yield: 3%
- SUSA Dividend Yield: 1%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
FDL - PCX
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 48%
R-squared: 23%
This indicates a weak positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 0
- FDL in IGF's comparables: No
- IGF in FDL's comparables: No
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the assets are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 11.46 vs 21.48
A high score indicates that the market values these assets similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- FDL Beta: 0.86 (Average)
- IGF Beta: 0.80 (Low)
- FDL 200-day Volatility: 11.84%
- IGF 200-day Volatility: 11.66%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- FDL Price vs 200-day MA: 105%
- IGF Price vs 200-day MA: 101%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | FDL | IGF |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 19% | 12% |
| Year_3 | 11% | 6% |
| Year_5 | 11% | 5% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: PCX vs NGM
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Large Cap Value Equities vs Utilities Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- FDL Dividend Yield: 4%
- IGF Dividend Yield: 3%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
SPY - PCX
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 47%
R-squared: 22%
This indicates a weak positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 0
- IGF in SPY's comparables: No
- SPY in IGF's comparables: No
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
valuation
Compares valuation metrics to assess if the assets are valued similarly by the market, indicating comparable investor expectations and perceived growth potential.
- P/E Ratio: 21.48 vs 17.86
A high score indicates that the market values these assets similarly relative to their financials, suggesting comparable growth expectations and risk profiles.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- IGF Beta: 0.80 (Low)
- SPY Beta: 1.00 (Average)
- IGF 200-day Volatility: 11.66%
- SPY 200-day Volatility: 11.69%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- IGF Price vs 200-day MA: 101%
- SPY Price vs 200-day MA: 104%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | IGF | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 12% | 20% |
| Year_3 | 6% | 8% |
| Year_5 | 5% | 14% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NGM vs PCX
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Utilities Equities vs Large Cap Growth Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- IGF Dividend Yield: 3%
- SPY Dividend Yield: 1%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
IGV - BTSThis ETF includes companies involved in infrastructure and software, providing a slightly different angle on tech investments, yet still comparable to IGV’s software focus.
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 28%
R-squared: 8%
This indicates a negligible relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 1
- IGF in IGV's comparables: Yes
- IGV in IGF's comparables: No
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- IGF Beta: 0.80 (Low)
- IGV Beta: 1.06 (Average)
- IGF 200-day Volatility: 11.66%
- IGV 200-day Volatility: 20.84%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- IGF Price vs 200-day MA: 101%
- IGV Price vs 200-day MA: 105%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | IGF | IGV |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 12% | 14% |
| Year_3 | 6% | 0% |
| Year_5 | 5% | 13% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NGM vs BTS
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Utilities Equities vs Technology Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- IGF Dividend Yield: 3%
- IGV Dividend Yield: 0%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
ProShares Ultra QQQ
QLD - PCX
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 32%
R-squared: 10%
This indicates a weak positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 0
- IGF in QLD's comparables: No
- QLD in IGF's comparables: No
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- IGF Beta: 0.80 (Low)
- QLD Beta: 2.27 (Very High)
- IGF 200-day Volatility: 11.66%
- QLD 200-day Volatility: 35.32%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- IGF Price vs 200-day MA: 101%
- QLD Price vs 200-day MA: 99%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | IGF | QLD |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 12% | 33% |
| Year_3 | 6% | 5% |
| Year_5 | 5% | 29% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NGM vs PCX
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Utilities Equities vs Leveraged Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- IGF Dividend Yield: 3%
- QLD Dividend Yield: 0%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Loading comparable ETFs ...