Find Comparable ETFs for ProShares Ultra SmallCap600
ProShares Ultra SmallCap600
SAA - PCXProShares Ultra S&P500
SSO - PCX
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 78%
R-squared: 60%
This indicates a strong positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 5
- SAA in SSO's comparables: No
- SSO in SAA's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- SAA Beta: 2.28 (Very High)
- SSO Beta: 2.03 (Very High)
- SAA 200-day Volatility: 38.12%
- SSO 200-day Volatility: 23.45%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- SAA Price vs 200-day MA: 93%
- SSO Price vs 200-day MA: 105%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | SAA | SSO |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 7% | 34% |
| Year_3 | -6% | 8% |
| Year_5 | 6% | 20% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: PCX vs PCX
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Leveraged Equities vs Leveraged Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- SAA Dividend Yield: 1%
- SSO Dividend Yield: 1%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
ProShares UltraPro S&P500
UPRO - PCX
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 77%
R-squared: 60%
This indicates a strong positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 7
- SAA in UPRO's comparables: No
- UPRO in SAA's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- SAA Beta: 2.28 (Very High)
- UPRO Beta: 3.08 (Very High)
- SAA 200-day Volatility: 38.12%
- UPRO 200-day Volatility: 35.21%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- SAA Price vs 200-day MA: 93%
- UPRO Price vs 200-day MA: 106%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | SAA | UPRO |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 7% | 47% |
| Year_3 | -6% | 6% |
| Year_5 | 6% | 21% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: PCX vs PCX
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Leveraged Equities vs Leveraged Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- SAA Dividend Yield: 1%
- UPRO Dividend Yield: 1%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares
FAS - PCX
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 80%
R-squared: 64%
This indicates a strong positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 1
- FAS in SAA's comparables: Yes
- SAA in FAS's comparables: No
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- FAS Beta: 3.10 (Very High)
- SAA Beta: 2.28 (Very High)
- FAS 200-day Volatility: 37.77%
- SAA 200-day Volatility: 38.12%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- FAS Price vs 200-day MA: 134%
- SAA Price vs 200-day MA: 93%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | FAS | SAA |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 53% | 7% |
| Year_3 | 1% | -6% |
| Year_5 | 8% | 6% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: PCX vs PCX
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Leveraged Equities vs Leveraged Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- FAS Dividend Yield: 1%
- SAA Dividend Yield: 1%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
TQQQ - NGM
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 63%
R-squared: 39%
This indicates a moderate positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 4
- SAA in TQQQ's comparables: No
- TQQQ in SAA's comparables: Yes
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- SAA Beta: 2.28 (Very High)
- TQQQ Beta: 3.45 (Very High)
- SAA 200-day Volatility: 38.12%
- TQQQ 200-day Volatility: 52.81%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- SAA Price vs 200-day MA: 93%
- TQQQ Price vs 200-day MA: 100%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | SAA | TQQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 7% | 43% |
| Year_3 | -6% | -3% |
| Year_5 | 6% | 30% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: PCX vs NGM
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Leveraged Equities vs Leveraged Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- SAA Dividend Yield: 1%
- TQQQ Dividend Yield: 1%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF
SUSA - PCX
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 80%
R-squared: 64%
This indicates a strong positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 3
- SAA in SUSA's comparables: No
- SUSA in SAA's comparables: No
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- SAA Beta: 2.28 (Very High)
- SUSA Beta: 1.02 (Average)
- SAA 200-day Volatility: 38.12%
- SUSA 200-day Volatility: 11.95%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- SAA Price vs 200-day MA: 93%
- SUSA Price vs 200-day MA: 103%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | SAA | SUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 7% | 19% |
| Year_3 | -6% | 6% |
| Year_5 | 6% | 14% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: PCX vs PCX
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Leveraged Equities vs Large Cap Growth Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- SAA Dividend Yield: 1%
- SUSA Dividend Yield: 1%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
SPY - PCX
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 78%
R-squared: 61%
This indicates a strong positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 2
- SAA in SPY's comparables: No
- SPY in SAA's comparables: No
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- SAA Beta: 2.28 (Very High)
- SPY Beta: 1.00 (Average)
- SAA 200-day Volatility: 38.12%
- SPY 200-day Volatility: 11.69%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- SAA Price vs 200-day MA: 93%
- SPY Price vs 200-day MA: 104%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | SAA | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 7% | 20% |
| Year_3 | -6% | 8% |
| Year_5 | 6% | 14% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: PCX vs PCX
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Leveraged Equities vs Large Cap Growth Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- SAA Dividend Yield: 1%
- SPY Dividend Yield: 1%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
The Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund
XLK - PCX
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 57%
R-squared: 33%
This indicates a moderate positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 3
- SAA in XLK's comparables: No
- XLK in SAA's comparables: No
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- SAA Beta: 2.28 (Very High)
- XLK Beta: 1.14 (Average)
- SAA 200-day Volatility: 38.12%
- XLK 200-day Volatility: 22.59%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- SAA Price vs 200-day MA: 93%
- XLK Price vs 200-day MA: 100%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | SAA | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 7% | 19% |
| Year_3 | -6% | 11% |
| Year_5 | 6% | 22% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: PCX vs PCX
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Leveraged Equities vs Technology Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- SAA Dividend Yield: 1%
- XLK Dividend Yield: 1%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
CIBR - NGM
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 68%
R-squared: 46%
This indicates a moderate positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 0
- CIBR in SAA's comparables: No
- SAA in CIBR's comparables: No
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- CIBR Beta: 1.00 (Average)
- SAA Beta: 2.28 (Very High)
- CIBR 200-day Volatility: 16.41%
- SAA 200-day Volatility: 38.12%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- CIBR Price vs 200-day MA: 111%
- SAA Price vs 200-day MA: 93%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | CIBR | SAA |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 16% | 7% |
| Year_3 | 3% | -6% |
| Year_5 | 13% | 6% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: NGM vs PCX
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Technology Equities vs Leveraged Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- CIBR Dividend Yield: 0%
- SAA Dividend Yield: 1%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF
FCOM - PCX
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 60%
R-squared: 36%
This indicates a moderate positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 0
- FCOM in SAA's comparables: No
- SAA in FCOM's comparables: No
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- FCOM Beta: 1.02 (Average)
- SAA Beta: 2.28 (Very High)
- FCOM 200-day Volatility: 15.94%
- SAA 200-day Volatility: 38.12%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- FCOM Price vs 200-day MA: 109%
- SAA Price vs 200-day MA: 93%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | FCOM | SAA |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 23% | 7% |
| Year_3 | -2% | -6% |
| Year_5 | 9% | 6% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: PCX vs PCX
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Large Cap Growth Equities vs Leveraged Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- FCOM Dividend Yield: 1%
- SAA Dividend Yield: 1%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
The Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF Fund
XLC - PCX
correlation
Measures how closely the two assets' prices move together over time. A high correlation suggests similar market reactions and investor sentiment.
Pearson Correlation: 58%
R-squared: 34%
This indicates a moderate positive relationship between the price movements of these assets.
network
Evaluates the overlap in business networks, partnerships, and industry relationships, indicating similarity in market positioning and competitive landscape.
- Common comparables: 0
- SAA in XLC's comparables: No
- XLC in SAA's comparables: No
A high score suggests the assets are often compared to each other and share many industry peers, indicating similar competitive environments and market perceptions.
volatility
Compares price volatility and risk profiles, indicating similarity in market behavior, risk, and potential for price swings.
- SAA Beta: 2.28 (Very High)
- XLC Beta: 1.02 (Average)
- SAA 200-day Volatility: 38.12%
- XLC 200-day Volatility: 15.14%
A high score suggests both assets have similar sensitivity to market movements, implying comparable risk levels and potential for both gains and losses.
momentum
Compares recent price momentum, showing similarity in short-term market performance and investor sentiment.
- SAA Price vs 200-day MA: 93%
- XLC Price vs 200-day MA: 111%
Performance Comparison:
| Period | SAA | XLC |
|---|---|---|
| Year_1 | 7% | 27% |
| Year_3 | -6% | 2% |
| Year_5 | 6% | 12% |
A high score indicates both assets are experiencing similar price trends relative to their recent history, suggesting comparable market enthusiasm or concern.
geo
Evaluates the geographical similarity of the assets based on country, currency, and exchange.
- Currency: USD vs USD
- Exchange: PCX vs PCX
A high score indicates that both assets operate in similar geographical markets, facing comparable economic conditions, regulations, and market dynamics.
sector
Compares the sector, industry, and other classifications of both assets.
- ETF Category: Leveraged Equities vs Large Cap Growth Equities
A high score indicates that the assets operate in similar business areas, facing comparable market conditions, regulatory environments, and industry trends.
Partial matches are considered for more nuanced comparisons, allowing for a higher score even when classifications are not identical but closely related.
dividend
Compares dividend policies, showing similarity in shareholder return strategies and income potential for investors.
- SAA Dividend Yield: 1%
- XLC Dividend Yield: 1%
A high score indicates similar approaches to returning capital to shareholders, suggesting comparable appeal to income-focused investors.
Loading comparable ETFs ...